In this prospective paired diagnostic study and single-center, randomized controlled trial, patients with early esophageal squamous neoplasia or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled in a paired diagnostic cohort (60 patients) and subsequently randomly assigned (1:1) to receive endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with AI-based Dissection Trajectory Prediction System (ADTPS) guidance or conventional ESD (without AI). Clinical data and operator workload scores (NASA-TLX) are collected during the procedure, and postoperative follow-up assessments are performed at days 1, 3, 7, and 14. The study aims to analyze the impact of ADTPS on the mean single-dissection time and operator workload in patients undergoing ESD by comparing the efficacy differences between the experimental and control groups. Additionally, the study investigates the effects of ADTPS on other postoperative complications including R0 resection rate, muscularis propria injury, intraoperative bleeding, perforation (acute and delayed), and total procedure time; conducts a comparative analysis of the safety and efficiency of AI-assisted versus conventional ESD; and develops effective clinical strategies for optimizing dissection trajectory and reducing complications in endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
160
The ADTPS is an artificial intelligence software system that analyzes endoscopic images in real time during ESD. It automatically identifies lesion boundaries and generates a recommended dissection trajectory overlaid on the endoscopic view. The endoscopist follows the AI-generated trajectory to perform submucosal dissection. The system provides visual guidance only and does not alter the standard surgical workflow.
The same endoscopic hardware platform is used, but the AI-based Dissection Trajectory Prediction System (ADTPS) is turned off. The endoscopist performs the ESD procedure based solely on clinical judgment and personal experience, following standard conventional ESD steps including marking, injection, circumferential incision, and submucosal dissection.
山东大学齐鲁医院
Jinan, Shandong, China
NASA-TLX Workload Score
Time frame: Immediately after the ESD procedure
Mean Single Dissection Time
Time frame: During the ESD procedure
R0 Resection Rate
Time frame: At the time of pathological examination
Muscularis Propria Injury Rate
Time frame: During the ESD procedure
Intraoperative Bleeding Episodes
Time frame: During the ESD procedure
Intraoperative Perforation Rate
Time frame: During the ESD procedure
Delayed Bleeding Rate
Time frame: Within 14 days after procedure
Delayed Perforation Rate
Time frame: Within 14 days after procedure
Total Procedure Time
Time frame: During the ESD procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.