This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of the Vertically Coronally Advanced Flap (VCAF) and the Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF), both combined with connective tissue graft (CTG) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD), for the treatment of Miller Class I gingival recession. Twenty-six Miller Class I gingival recession defects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the VCAF + CTG + EMD group or the CAF + CTG + EMD group. Clinical outcomes, including mean root coverage, complete root coverage, recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, gingival thickness, vestibular depth, and esthetic outcomes, will be assessed at baseline and throughout a 6-month follow-up period. Three-dimensional digital models obtained from an intraoral scanner will also be used to evaluate soft tissue changes following treatment. The study is designed to determine whether the VCAF technique provides superior clinical and esthetic outcomes compared with the conventional CAF technique.
Gingival recession is a common mucogingival condition that may result in dentin hypersensitivity, root caries, plaque accumulation, and esthetic concerns. Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) combined with connective tissue graft (CTG) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of localized gingival recession because of its predictable root coverage outcomes. However, coronal advancement of the flap may reduce vestibular depth, potentially affecting oral hygiene practices and long-term soft tissue stability. The Vertically Coronally Advanced Flap (VCAF) technique has been developed to facilitate coronal flap advancement while preserving vestibular depth. This study compares VCAF and conventional CAF, both combined with CTG and enamel matrix derivative (EMD), to determine whether VCAF can provide comparable or improved root coverage while minimizing changes in vestibular depth and achieving favorable esthetic outcomes. In addition to conventional clinical assessments, three-dimensional digital intraoral scans will be used to quantify soft tissue changes following surgery, providing a comprehensive evaluation of treatment outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
16
A root coverage surgical procedure using the conventional Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) in combination with a connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of Miller Class I gingival recession.
A root coverage surgical procedure using the Vertically Coronally Advanced Flap (VCAF) in combination with a connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of Miller Class I gingival recession.
Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Mean Root Coverage (MRC)
The mean percentage of root surface coverage achieved following treatment, assessed by measuring the root coverage area on intraoral scan files using digital measurement software
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
Vestibular Depth (VD)
The change in vestibular depth from baseline, measured on intraoral scan files using digital measurement software.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
Complete Root Coverage (CRC)
The percentage of treated recession sites achieving complete coverage of the previously exposed root surface, assessed using intraoral scan files and digital measurement software.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
Recession Depth (RD)
The vertical distance from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin, measured on intraoral scan files using digital measurement software.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
Recession Width (RW)
The horizontal width of the gingival recession defect, measured on intraoral scan files using digital measurement software.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
Keratinized Tissue Width (KTW)
The width of keratinized tissue at the treated site, measured on intraoral scan files using digital measurement software
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
Gingival Thickness (GT)
The thickness of the gingival tissue at the predefined measurement point, measured using intraoral scan files and digital measurement software.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
Root Esthetic Score (RES)
The esthetic outcome of root coverage treatment assessed using the Root Esthetic Score (RES). The score evaluates five esthetic parameters: gingival margin level, marginal tissue contour, soft tissue texture, mucogingival alignment, and gingival color.
Time frame: 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.