this study seeks to compare the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer and iCare COMPASS for both clinical accuracy and operational advantages.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
28
This study will be a crossover study. Patients who express interest in taking part in the study will be evaluated using Humphrey SITA-faster, which is the current standard of care for visual perimetry, and the iCare COMPASS in the same visit. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups of alternating testing order with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer vs the iCare COMPASS and vice versa. The mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, mean deviation cluster, and fixation plot results will be compared. For analysis, participants will be grouped according to the inclusion criteria.
Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Visual Fields will be assessed via the current standard of care Humphrey SITA-Faster when available. The mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, mean deviation cluster, and fixation plot obtained will be compared with the same measures on the iCare
Testing will be performed with either one or two encounters with the patient or as determined by the patients' clinician.
Time frame: within 1-3 months post visit
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.