The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to learn whether NEST, a new trauma-informed group therapy program, is feasible and acceptable for parents with Complex PTSD, a condition that can develop after prolonged or repeated traumatic experiences. Parenting can be especially challenging for people with this condition, and few treatment programs currently address this specific need. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the NEST group intervention feasible to deliver and acceptable to parents with Complex PTSD? * Do parents' trauma-related symptoms and their experience of the parenting role change from before to after the intervention? Participants will: * Complete online questionnaires about trauma-related symptoms and parenting before the group therapy, after it ends, and again three months later * Take part in nine weekly 90-minute group therapy sessions, co-led by a member of the study team and a mental health professional from the treatment site * Some participants will additionally be invited to a short interview about their experience with the group therapy
NEST (Nurturing Emotional Safety in Trauma-Affected Parenting) is a single-arm, multicenter pilot feasibility and acceptability study of a newly developed, manualized trauma-informed parenting group intervention for parents with ICD-11 Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD). The 9-session group intervention addresses core parenting-related challenges associated with CPTSD, including self-concept and self-efficacy as a parent, emotion regulation within the parent-child relationship, setting boundaries, regulating closeness and distance in the parent-child relationship, and age-appropriate communication with children about the parent's diagnosis. Sessions are trauma-sensitive but not trauma-focused; traumatic memories themselves are not processed within the group. Each group is closed, comprises 6-8 participants, and is co-led by a member of the sponsor's (OST) study team together with a trained psychologist/psychotherapist affiliated with the respective treatment site. The study is conducted at two clinical sites, the Psychiatric Services Aargau (PDAG) and the Integrated Psychiatry Winterthur (ipw). At each clinical site, the NEST group therapy forms part of participants' regular clinical care and is billed via mandatory health insurance; study-specific procedures are conducted separately by the OST study team. These study-specific procedures consist of self-report questionnaires completed by all participants and a semi-structured qualitative interview completed by a subset of participants after completing the group therapy, to explore their experience of the intervention in greater depth.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
32
The NEST group intervention is a manualized, trauma-informed program consisting of nine weekly 90-minute group sessions, co-led by a member of the study team and a mental health professional from the treatment site. Groups are closed and comprise 6-8 parents. Sessions address parenting-related challenges associated with Complex PTSD, including self-concept and self-efficacy as a parent, emotion regulation within the parent-child relationship, setting boundaries, regulating closeness and distance in the parent-child relationship, and age-appropriate communication with children about the parent's diagnosis. Sessions are trauma-sensitive but not trauma-focused; traumatic memories are not processed within the group.
Psychiatrische Dienste Aargau (PDAG)
Windisch, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland
Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences (OST)
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, Switzerland
Integrierte Psychiatrie Winterthur (ipw)
Winterthur, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Feasibility - Enrollment/ Recruitment Rate
Feasibility will be assessed descriptively by the number of participants enrolled and the time required to reach the planned sample size.
Time frame: From day one of recruitment to baseline measurement T0
Feasibility - Retention Rate
Retention will be assessed as the proportion of participants completing the post-intervention assessment (T1). A retention rate ≥70% at T1 is defined a priori as the benchmark for implementation-readiness.
Time frame: From enrollment through T1 (approximately 9-10 weeks after enrollment)
Feasibility - Intervention Adherence (Session Attendance)
Adherence will be assessed as the proportion of participants attending at least 7 of 9 group sessions. A rate of ≥70% of participants attending at least 7 of 9 sessions is defined a priori as the benchmark for implementation-readiness.
Time frame: From enrollment through completion of the 9-session group intervention (approximately 9-10 weeks after enrollment)
Feasibility - Protocol Deviations
Feasibility will be assessed descriptively through documentation of protocol deviations occurring during the intervention.
Time frame: From enrollment through T1 (approximately 9-10 weeks after enrollment)
Acceptability - TFA Questionnaire
Acceptability will be assessed using the generic Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire (TFA; Sekhon et al., 2022), translated into German and adapted to the group therapy context. The TFA covers seven constructs (affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, self-efficacy) plus a general acceptability item. Acceptability is considered sufficient if ratings indicate an overall positive evaluation.
Time frame: Post-intervention (T1, approximately 9-10 weeks after enrollment)
Acceptability - Qualitative Interviews
A subset of participants will additionally complete a semi-structured qualitative interview (approximately 40-50 minutes) exploring their experience of the intervention. Acceptability is considered sufficient if no substantial recurring concerns regarding safety, burden, or contextual fit emerge in qualitative findings.
Time frame: Post-intervention (T1, approximately 9-10 weeks after enrollment)
ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD Symptom Severity
Assessed using the International Trauma Questionnaire with Clinical Checks (ITQ-CC; Shevlin et al., 2025; German version: Kratzer et al., 2025), which measures ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD symptom severity, including disturbances in self-organisation. Changes in total and/or subscale scores across time points will be analysed descriptively and exploratively.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, approximately 9-10 weeks after enrollment), and 3-month follow-up (T2)
Parental Stress (PSS)
Assessed using the Parental Stress Scale (PSS; Berry \& Jones, 1995; German validation: Kölch et al., 2022), an 18-item measure of parenting-related stress across positive and negative dimensions of the parenting role. Changes in total and/or subscale scores across time points will be analysed descriptively and exploratively.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, approximately 9-10 weeks after enrollment), and 3-month follow-up (T2)
Parental Self-Efficacy
Assessed using the Brief Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (BPSES; Woolgar et al., 2025), a 5-item measure of parents' perceived competence and confidence in their parenting role. Changes in total score across time points will be analysed descriptively and exploratively.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, approximately 9-10 weeks after enrollment), and 3-month follow-up (T2)
Parenting Practices
Assessed using the Parenting Scale Short Form (PS-8; Kliem et al., 2018), an 8-item measure of dysfunctional discipline practices, comprising two subscales - laxness and overreactivity - developed and validated in a German representative population sample. Changes in total and/or subscale scores across time points will be analysed descriptively and exploratively.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, approximately 9-10 weeks after enrollment), and 3-month follow-up (T2)
Parental Reflective Functioning
Assessed using the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ; Luyten et al., 2017; German validation: Wildner et al., 2024), a 16-item measure of parents' capacity to mentalise in relation to their child, across three subscales: certainty about mental states, interest and curiosity, and pre-mentalising modes. Changes in total and/or subscale scores across time points will be analysed descriptively and exploratively.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, approximately 9-10 weeks after enrollment), and 3-month follow-up (T2)
Family Emotional Responsiveness
Assessed using the Family Assessment Device - Affective Responsiveness subscale (FAD-AR; Miller et al., 1985; German validation: Beierlein et al., 2017), a 7-item subscale assessing the quality of emotional responsiveness within the family. Changes in score across time points will be analysed descriptively and exploratively.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, approximately 9-10 weeks after enrollment), and 3-month follow-up (T2)