Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in Kuwait, where most cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage and there is no national screening program. This prospective pilot feasibility study will offer low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening to approximately 500 high-risk individuals aged 50-80 years across Kuwait. The primary objective is to assess the uptake of, and barriers to, LDCT lung cancer screening in Kuwait and to establish a framework for a national screening program. Participants undergo eligibility assessment (smoking history of at least 20 pack-years, totalled across all tobacco products using pre-specified equivalency conversions for shisha/waterpipe, cigar, pipe, and roll-your-own tobacco), baseline assessment, LDCT screening with Lung-RADS-based management, a second screening round at 12 months, and follow-up. LDCT images are read by radiologists and in parallel by artificial intelligence (AI) software to evaluate AI-assisted reading. Findings will inform national lung cancer screening guidelines for Kuwait.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
500
Low-dose chest CT without contrast, reported using Lung-RADS. Management and follow-up intervals follow the Lung-RADS category (annual repeat for 1-2; short-interval CT at 6 months for 3 and 3 months for 4A; diagnostic work-up and multidisciplinary team referral for 4B/4X; incidental findings referred per modifier S). All scans are additionally analyzed by artificial intelligence software in parallel with radiologist reading.
Lung Cancer Screening Clinic, Chest Diseases Hospital
Kuwait City, Kuwait
Consent rate (co-primary outcome P1)
Proportion of eligible individuals approached who consent to participate in screening. Co-primary outcome P1. Overall screening uptake (the proportion of eligible approached individuals who receive an adequate baseline scan, computed on the evaluable cohort) is additionally reported as a descriptive measure in the participant flow diagram.
Time frame: 12 months from start of recruitment
Baseline LDCT scan completion rate (co-primary outcome P2)
Proportion of consented, evaluable participants who complete a technically adequate baseline LDCT scan within 90 days of consent. The evaluable cohort comprises consented participants whose consent date precedes data lock by at least 90 days (a full 90-day opportunity window); participants consented fewer than 90 days before data lock are excluded from the denominator as not yet evaluable. Participants who withdraw after consent are counted as non-completers. Co-primary outcome P2.
Time frame: 15 months from start of recruitment (12-month recruitment period plus 90-day scan-completion window)
Barriers to screening participation
Reasons for declining screening among eligible individuals, collected with a structured decline questionnaire (categorical response options plus free text), and barrier themes coded from responses. Reported as frequencies and proportions of barrier categories; no scored scale is used for this outcome.
Time frame: 12 months from start of recruitment
Lung cancer detection rate and stage distribution
Number and proportion of screen-detected lung cancers, by TNM stage (stage I-II vs III-IV).
Time frame: 24 months from start of recruitment
Lung-RADS category distribution
Proportion of baseline scans classified as Lung-RADS 1-2, 3, 4A, and 4B/4X.
Time frame: 12 months from start of recruitment
Artificial intelligence software performance
Concordance of AI-based nodule detection and Lung-RADS categorization with radiologist reading (sensitivity, specificity, agreement).
Time frame: 24 months from start of recruitment
Radiation exposure
Mean effective dose (mSv) per LDCT examination and cumulative effective dose per participant.
Time frame: 24 months from start of recruitment
Incidental findings rate
Proportion of scans with clinically significant incidental findings (Lung-RADS modifier S).
Time frame: 12 months from start of recruitment
Adherence to recommended follow-up
Proportion of participants completing recommended follow-up imaging (annual round 2, or short-interval CT at 3 or 6 months).
Time frame: 24 months from start of recruitment
Participant-reported experience and distress
Participant-reported worry, satisfaction, and psychological distress measured with study questionnaires at baseline, post-CT, results visit, and exit. Lung cancer and radiation worry are single-item scales (range 1-5; higher scores indicate greater worry, a worse outcome). Satisfaction and experience items are 5-point scales (range 1-5; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction, a better outcome). Psychological distress is measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4; total score range 0-12; higher scores indicate greater anxiety and depression symptoms, a worse outcome).
Time frame: 24 months from start of recruitment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.