To evaluate, by standardized radiographic follow-up, whether locally delivered 1% metformin gel improves bone healing around immediately placed dental implants augmented with GBR.
Dental implants are now a routine treatment option for replacing missing teeth because they restore masticatory function, preserve adjacent tooth structure, and provide favorable long-term survival when case selection and surgical execution are appropriate . After extraction, however, the alveolar ridge does not remain static. The socket undergoes dimensional remodeling, and this remodeling may affect implant position, emergence profile, soft-tissue contour, and the need for additional augmentation . Immediate implant placement was introduced to reduce the number of surgical procedures and shorten the total treatment period. When it is performed in a suitable socket, it may also help maintain the peri-implant tissue architecture. The technique is more demanding in the posterior maxilla, where the extraction socket is often wider than the implant diameter and the native bone is commonly less dense than in other regions. These features can make primary stability, gap management, and prosthetically driven positioning more challenging . The space between the implant surface and the socket wall, often described clinically as the horizontal gap or jumping distance, is a key biological issue in immediate implant therapy. Small gaps surrounded by intact socket walls may heal with little intervention, but wider gaps, thin buccal plates, and deficient low-density bone reduce the predictability of spontaneous bone fill. For this reason, GBR with particulate grafts and resorbable membranes is frequently used to support space maintenance, provide osteoconduction, and restrict soft-tissue invasion during bone repair. Although GBR provides a useful scaffold for regeneration, the addition of a biologically active agent may enhance the cellular events that drive early osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and mineralization. Metformin, a biguanide drug widely used in type 2 diabetes mellitus, has attracted attention in bone-regeneration research because it can activate AMP-activated protein kinase, improve osteoblastic differentiation, reduce oxidative stress, and influence angiogenic signaling. Local delivery is clinically attractive because it can concentrate the drug at the surgical site while keeping systemic exposure minimal . The present randomized radiographic study was therefore designed to assess whether topical 1% metformin gel, when used with GBR, improves peri-implant bone healing around immediately placed implants in the posterior maxilla. The extended 12-month analysis was added to explore whether the early radiographic bone-density response observed during osseointegration could be maintained after prosthetic rehabilitation and functional loading.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
12
A 1% metformin gel was topically applied around the dental implant at the time of immediate implant placement. The intervention was used in conjunction with guided bone regeneration using an alloplastic bone graft and collagen membrane in the posterior maxillary region.
Immediate dental implant placement was performed following atraumatic extraction in the posterior maxillary region. Guided bone regeneration was performed using an alloplastic bone graft and collagen membrane around the implant. This procedure was performed in both study groups; participants in the control group received this protocol without topical metformin gel.
Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch
Asyut, Assiut Governorate, Egypt
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch
Asyut, Egypt
Peri-implant Bone Density
Peri-implant bone density was assessed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Bone density was measured as the mean gray-scale value within a standardized region of interest adjacent to the dental implant. Changes in peri-implant bone density were compared between the metformin and control groups.
Time frame: Baseline (immediately after implant placement) , 6 months, and 12 months.
Change in Crestal Bone Level
Crestal bone level around the dental implant was evaluated radiographically using CBCT. The distance between the implant reference point and the adjacent crestal bone level was measured, and changes from baseline to 6 months were compared between the study groups.
Time frame: Baseline (immediately after implant placement) and 6, 12 months.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.