This is a prospective, single-center, crossover study comparing EndoFLIP measurements obtained in two patient positions, supine and left lateral decubitus, in pediatric and young adult patients. The Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP) is an FDA-approved device for patients aged 5 and older that utilizes high-resolution impedance planimetry and volume-controlled distension to assess esophagogastric junction function. Currently, no standardized positioning protocol exists, and proceduralists perform EndoFLIP based on individual preference, either supine or left lateral decubitus. This variability may introduce measurement inconsistencies, particularly when comparing preoperative and postoperative assessments performed in different positions.
The Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP) is an FDA-approved device for patients aged 5 years and older and it utilizes high-resolution impedance planimetry and volume-controlled distension to evaluate the GI lumen including the esophagogastric junction. EndoFLIP has become an invaluable tool in pediatric gastroenterology helping to characterize various luminal conditions including but not limited to esophageal stenosis and compression, screening for dysmotility, guiding esophageal dilation through the selection of the optimal dilator size, among others. Despite its increasing clinical utility, there is currently no standardized protocol for its use and much of the technique is derived from adult practice. Proceduralists perform measurements based on individual preference, with some favoring the supine position and others preferring the left lateral decubitus position. This lack of consensus has been an active topic of discussion among pediatric advanced endoscopists who perform EndoFLIP, yet no published studies exist comparing measurements obtained in different positions. This variability presents a significant clinical problem because positioning may influence EndoFLIP parameters through several physiological mechanisms. In the supine position, abdominal viscera shift posteriorly, potentially altering esophagogastric junction geometry and increasing intra-abdominal pressure. In the left lateral decubitus position, the gastric fundus falls away from the esophagogastric junction due to gravity, possibly reducing external compression and changing the angle of His. Additionally, diaphragmatic crural tension, thoracic mechanics, and vascular engorgement patterns may differ between positions, all of which could affect luminal measurements. These positional differences have important clinical implications, particularly when comparing preoperative and postoperative measurements, assessing dilation durability within the same procedure, or monitoring disease progression longitudinally over multiple visits. If measurements are obtained in different positions across these clinical scenarios, apparent changes in esophagogastric junction function may be artifactual rather than reflective of true physiological change. The investigators hypothesize that patient positioning, supine versus left lateral decubitus, impacts EndoFLIP measurements. This is a non-directional hypothesis, as there is currently insufficient evidence to predict whether measurements will be higher or lower in one position compared to the other.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
25
The Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP) is an FDA-approved device for patients aged 5 years and older and it utilizes high-resolution impedance planimetry and volume-controlled distension to evaluate the GI lumen.
Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children's Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
RECRUITINGDiameter
Diameter of esophagus (mm)
Time frame: During procedure only (less than 10 minutes)
Cross sectional area
Esophageal cross sectional area measured in square millimeters (mm²)
Time frame: During procedure only (less than 10 minutes)
Compliance
esophageal compliance (mm3/mmHg)
Time frame: During procedure only (less than 10 minutes)
distensibility index
esophageal distensibility index(mm2/mmHg)
Time frame: During procedure only (less than 10 minutes)
Pressure
intraluminal esophageal pressure (mmHg)
Time frame: During procedure only (less than 10 minutes)
Differences in diameter
calculated difference in diameter between supine vs left lateral position (mm), percentage difference from left lateral position to supine position and also supine to left lateral position
Time frame: During procedure only (less than 10 minutes)
Differences in Cross sectional area
calculated difference in Cross sectional area between supine vs left lateral position (mm2), percentage difference from left lateral position to supine position and also supine to left lateral position
Time frame: During procedure only (less than 10 minutes)
Differences in esophageal compliance (mm3/mmHg)
calculated difference in esophageal compliance (mm3/mmHg) between supine vs left lateral position, percentage difference from left lateral position to supine position and also supine to left lateral position
Time frame: During procedure only (less than 10 minutes)
Differences in esophageal distensibility index(mm2/mmHg)
calculated difference in esophageal distensibility index(mm2/mmHg) between supine vs left lateral position, percentage difference from left lateral position to supine position and also supine to left lateral position
Time frame: During procedure only (less than 10 minutes)
Differences in intraluminal esophageal pressure (mmHg)
calculated difference in intraluminal esophageal pressure (mmHg) between supine vs left lateral position, percentage difference from left lateral position to supine position and also supine to left lateral position
Time frame: During procedure only (less than 10 minutes)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.