The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether precision closed-loop neuromodulation treatments can improve depressive symptoms and daily functioning in people with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD). The study will assess the effectiveness and safety of two neuromodulation approaches: closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS). Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder refers to depression that does not improve sufficiently after adequate treatment with standard antidepressant therapies. This study focuses on people with TRD, including individuals with early-onset depression, a history of self-harm or suicidal thoughts, or depression associated with traumatic experiences. This study aims to answer whether closed-loop DBS and taVNS can reduce depressive symptoms compared with sham stimulation, whether these treatments are safe and well tolerated, and whether changes in brain activity are associated with clinical improvement. This is a multicenter, prospective clinical study conducted at Shanghai Mental Health Center, Beijing Anding Hospital, and Xuanwu Hospital. Eligible participants with TRD will receive either DBS or taVNS according to patient preference. Within each intervention group, participants will be randomly assigned to active stimulation or sham stimulation groups to assess treatment effects. During the study, participants will receive neuromodulation treatment and complete regular follow-up assessments. These assessments will include evaluation of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, cognitive function, social functioning, brain electrical activity using electroencephalography (EEG), brain imaging using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and monitoring of adverse events. The study will compare changes in clinical symptoms, brain-related measures, and safety outcomes between active and sham stimulation groups. The findings may help determine whether precision neuromodulation approaches can provide a new treatment option for people with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
70
Closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an implanted neuromodulation intervention that delivers electrical stimulation based on real-time neural signals. Participants assigned to the DBS pathway will undergo implantation of a DBS system and receive either active or delayed stimulation according to the randomized study assignment. Clinical outcomes, cognitive function, brain activity, and safety outcomes will be assessed during follow-up.
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation intervention that delivers electrical stimulation through electrodes placed on auricular sites associated with the vagus nerve. Participants assigned to the taVNS pathway will receive either active or sham stimulation according to the randomized study assignment. Clinical outcomes, cognitive function, brain activity, and safety outcomes will be assessed during follow-up.
Change in 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) score
The primary efficacy outcome is the change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score from baseline to week 8 after intervention. The HAMD-17 is used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. A decrease in HAMD-17 score indicates improvement in depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) score
The change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) score from baseline to Week 8 will be evaluated to assess changes in anxiety symptom severity. The HAMA total score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. A decrease in HAMA score indicates improvement in anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA) score
The change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score from baseline to Week 8 will be evaluated to assess changes in cognitive function. The MoCA total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. An increase in MoCA score indicates improvement in cognitive function.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score
The change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from baseline to Week 8 will be evaluated to assess changes in depressive symptom severity. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. A decrease in MADRS score indicates improvement in depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score
The change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score from baseline to Week 8 will be evaluated to assess changes in depressive symptoms. The PHQ-9 total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. A decrease in PHQ-9 score indicates improvement in depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score
The change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score from baseline to Week 8 will be evaluated to assess changes in anxiety symptoms. The GAD-7 total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. A decrease in GAD-7 score indicates improvement in anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Change in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) score, using Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S)
The change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) score from baseline to each follow-up assessment will be evaluated to assess changes in overall illness severity. The CGI-S is rated on a 7-point scale from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater illness severity. A decrease in CGI-S score indicates improvement in overall illness severity.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Change in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) score, using Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I).
The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) score will be used to assess overall clinical improvement relative to baseline. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point scale from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating very much improved, 4 indicating no change, and 7 indicating very much worse. Lower scores indicate greater clinical improvement.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Change in Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) score
The change in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale score from baseline to each follow-up assessment will be evaluated to assess changes in personal and social functioning. The PSP total score ranges from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better personal and social functioning. An increase in PSP score indicates improvement in personal and social functioning.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Change in Social Functioning Rating Scale (SFRS) score
The change in Social Functioning Rating Scale (SFRS) score from baseline to Week 8 will be evaluated to assess changes in social functioning. The SFRS consists of 36 items, with each item scored from 0 to 7, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 252. Higher scores indicate poorer social functioning. A decrease in SFRS score indicates improvement in social functioning.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
EEG Delta, Theta, Alpha, and Beta Band Power and Theta/Beta Power Ratio
EEG recordings will be analyzed to quantify changes in spectral power across predefined frequency bands, including delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), beta (13-30 Hz) bands, and theta/beta power ratio from baseline to week 8.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Changes in neuroimaging measures assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Number and percentage of participants with adverse events or serious adverse events
Adverse events will be assessed throughout the study period. Clinically significant findings from laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiography, and other examinations will be recorded as adverse events when considered clinically significant by the investigator. When a specific clinical diagnosis can be made, the diagnosis will be recorded as the adverse event; when no specific diagnosis can be made, the clinical significance will be determined by the investigator. Adverse events will be classified as mild, moderate, or severe, and their occurrence time, severity, duration, management, and outcome will be recorded. The number and percentage of participants experiencing adverse events will be summarized.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.