Clinical Outcomes of Magnesium Sulfate in Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection

Overview

This observational study will compare the clinical outcomes of two cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection protocols used in routine clinical practice for adults with chronic cervical radicular pain caused by cervical disc herniation. One group received lidocaine, dexamethasone, and normal saline, while the other group received lidocaine, dexamethasone, and magnesium sulfate. Pain intensity, neck-related disability, and health-related quality of life will be evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form-12. Outcomes will be assessed before the procedure and at routine follow-up visits up to three months after the procedure. Treatment selection was based on routine clinical decisions and was not assigned by the researchers. No additional medication, procedure, test, or follow-up visit will be performed for the purposes of this study. The study uses data from existing medical records and routine clinical follow-up assessments.

This single-center, comparative retrospective observational cohort study will evaluate adults who underwent cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection for chronic cervical radicular pain between January 1 and July 1, 2026. Participants will be classified according to the injection protocol received during routine clinical care: lidocaine, dexamethasone, and normal saline, or lidocaine, dexamethasone, and magnesium sulfate. The injection protocol was selected by the treating physician as part of routine clinical practice and was not assigned by the investigators. Pain intensity will be evaluated using Numeric Rating Scale scores recorded before the procedure and at 1 hour, 3 weeks, and 3 months after the procedure. Neck-related disability and health-related quality of life will be evaluated using Neck Disability Index and Short Form-12 scores recorded before the procedure and at 3 weeks and 3 months. All study data will be obtained retrospectively from existing electronic medical records, archived patient files, and routine clinical follow-up records. No prospective data collection, study-specific medication, treatment allocation, dose modification, procedure, test, or additional follow-up visit will be performed. The study aims to determine whether the magnesium sulfate-containing protocol was associated with greater improvement in pain, neck-related disability, and health-related quality of life during the 3-month follow-up period compared with the standard protocol.