The Multimodal Laser Project is a prospective, randomized, split-face clinical study investigating a novel combination of laser and light-based treatments for facial photodamage with the long-term perspective of improving skin cancer prevention. The study includes 35 patients with facial photodamage and AKs. One side of the face receives a multimodal treatment combining three complementary technologies: 1927-nm thulium laser, 1550-nm non-ablative fractional laser, and intense pulsed light (IPL), while the contralateral side serves as an untreated control. Participants are followed for 14 months to assess both clinical efficacy and longer-term preventive effects. The overall aim is not only to determine whether multimodal laser treatment improves photodamaged skin, but also to gain a deeper understanding of how the treatment affects the underlying biology of chronically sun-damaged skin and its potential role in skin cancer prevention.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
35
Fractional non-ablative 1927-nm thulium laser treatment applied to the randomized intervention side of the face
Fractional non-ablative 1550-nm Er:Glass laser treatment applied to the randomized intervention side of the face
Intense pulsed light treatment applied to the randomized intervention side of the face
Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen NV, Denmark
RECRUITINGClinical improvement
Change from baseline in the overall clinical appearance of facial photodamage will be assessed using a 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) based on standardized clinical photographs and on-site evaluation. Assessments will be performed by the site investigator and independent blinded physicians. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where 1 = very much improved and 5 = worse. Lower scores indicate greater clinical improvement.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 60
Transcriptomic response
Changes in gene expression profiles will be assessed by transcriptomic analysis of tape-strip samples collected before and after treatment and compared between intervention arms.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 60
Safety of interventions
Safety will be evaluated by the incidence, severity, and relationship to treatment of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) throughout the study period. AEs and SAEs will be recorded continuously at each study visit and assessed by the investigator.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 60
Pain assessment
Pain associated with each intervention will be assessed using a patient-reported Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 1 to 10, where 1 indicates minimal pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 60
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point satisfaction scale ranging from -2 to +2, where -2 indicates very dissatisfied, 0 indicates neutral, and +2 indicates very satisfied.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 60
Change in Actinic Keratosis Count
Change from baseline in the total number of clinically identified actinic keratoses within the study area.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 60
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.