This study is open to adults aged 18 and older who have a condition known as active idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) or myositis. People can participate if they have a specific type of myositis. The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called nerandomilast improves IIM symptoms. Participants are put into 2 groups randomly, which means by chance. One group takes nerandomilast tablets and the other group takes placebo tablets. Placebo tablets look like nerandomilast tablets but do not contain any medicine. Participants take nerandomilast or placebo twice a day for 1 year. Participants are in the study for about 1 year and 2 months. During this time, they visit the study site at least 16 times. During this time, doctors regularly check the participant's health, IIM symptoms, and take note of any unwanted effects. Participants fill in questionnaires about their IIM symptoms and how IIM impacts their quality of life. The results are compared between the 2 groups to see whether the treatment works.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
270
Placebo-matching nerandomilast
Nerandomilast
Arizona Neuromuscular Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
University of California Irvine
Irvine, California, United States
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Total improvement score (TIS) score (continuous) at Week 52
The TIS composite score includes 6 core set measures: manual muscle testing (MMT8), extra-muscular disease activity (MDAAT), patient global disease activity (PtGA), physician global disease activity (PhGA), health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI), and muscle enzymes. An improvement score for each core set measure will be assigned using the absolute percent change, based on predetermined ranges. The TIS will be the sum of the all core set measure, scoring from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to a greater degree of improvement.
Time frame: At Week 52.
Achievement of a TIS-40 response (yes/no; defined as TIS ≥40) at Week 52
Number of participants with 40 TIS points or higher.
Time frame: At Week 52.
Achievement of a successful tapering of oral corticosteroids (OCS) (yes/no) at Week 52
Number of participants achieving a TIS-40 response at Week 52 and ≤5 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 52
Time frame: At Week 52.
Change from baseline in cutaneous dermatomyositis disease area and severity index activity score (CDASI-A) at Week 52 (in participants with baseline CDASI-A ≥6)
The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity score (CDASI-A) is a questionnaire assessing skin disease activity and damage in patients with dermatomyositis (DM). It ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating more severe active skin involvement.
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 52.
Change from baseline in extra-muscular disease activity as per myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT) at Week 52
Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) is a questionnaire assessing the disease activity of extra-muscular organ systems and muscle in participants with IIM. It is a combined tool with two parallel scores: the MYOACT VAS and the MITAX. The Myositis disease activity assessment (MYOACT) visual analogue scale (VAS) scores the overall severity of disease activity. The sum of the individual scores ranges from 0 to 70, The higher the more severe. For the Myositis Intention-to-Treat Activity Index (MITAX), each question is answered with either: 0 = not present; 1 = improving; 2 = the same; 3 = worse; 4 = new. The summed scores are summed to obtain a total MITAX score with a range of 0 to 63, the higher the more severe.
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 52.
Change from baseline in PtGA at Week 52
Patient global disease activity (PtGA) measures the participant's self-assessment of the disease. It is composed of a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Patients will mark their assessment between "extremely poor" (0) and "excellent" (100). The difference between 0 (extremely poor) and the patient assessment is the PtGA, where higher distances indicate a better health status.
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 52.
Change from baseline in clinical-reported outcome 1 at Week 12
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 12.
Change from baseline in PhGA at Week 52
Physician global activity (PhGA) captures the physician's assessment of the participant's overall health. It is composed of a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Physicians will mark their assessment between "extremely poor" (0) and "excellent" (100). The difference between 0 (extremely poor) and the physician assessment is the PhGA, where higher distances indicate a better health status.
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 52.
Change from baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 52
The health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) assesses difficulties in performing activities of daily living across 8 domains. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-3. The higher the score, the higher the disability.
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 52.
Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 52
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT-8) assesses the muscle strength of 8 proximal, distal, and axial muscle groups. Each item is rated from 0 to 10, with the total score ranging from 0 to 150, where higher scores mean better muscle strength condition.
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 52.
Achievement of a TIS-60 response (yes/no; defined as TIS ≥60) at Week 52
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 52.
Change from baseline in clinical-reported outcome 2 at Week 12
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 12.
Change from baseline in the most abnormal baseline muscle enzymes (aldolase, CK, AST, ALT, or LDH) at Week 52
CK means creatine kinase, AST means aspartate aminotransferase, ALT means alanine aminotransferase, and LDH means lactate dehydrogenase.
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 52.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Colorado Denver
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Heuer M.D. Research, Inc
Orlando, Florida, United States
Kansas University Medical Center
Fairway, Kansas, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
...and 137 more locations