Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Risk Stratification for Defibrillator Implantation in Heart Failure Patients Requiring Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

Overview

This randomized study aimed to compare the efficacy of LBBP without defibrillator vs biventricular pacing with defibrillator (BiV-ICD/CRT-D) in patients with LB-NICM and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% risk categorized by CMR imaging.

This is a single centre, prospective, randomized study in which patients with LB-NICM, LVEF ≤35% and heart failure despite guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) will be included. CMR with gadolinium contrast will be performed to risk categorize the patient into low-risk or high risk based on presence of scar. Low risk patients (without scar ?\<5%) will be randomized in 1:1 fashion to receive either LBBP without defibrillator or traditional CRT-D with biventricular pacing. LBBP will be performed by premature ventricular complex guided approach with 3830 selectsecure lead and C315His sheath in the proximal interventricular septum 1.5-2 cm distal to His bundle. LBB capture will be confirmed as per standard criteria. If LBBP lead implantation is unsuccessful, a coronary sinus lead will be placed to achieve biventricular pacing. In patients randomized to BiV-ICD, left ventricular lead will be placed in the postero-lateral branch of the coronary sinus with Q-LV duration of \>90ms. If coronary sinus lead placement is unsuccessful, a LBBP lead will be implanted. The defibrillator lead will deployed in the right ventricular apical septum.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes

Central Contacts