DAN-RELEASE is a national, randomized, registry-based trial including 7,000 participants in Denmark. The trial aims to determine whether discontinuation of long-term aspirin therapy is non-inferior to continued aspirin therapy in older adults with stable ischemic heart disease. Long-term aspirin therapy is recommended for patients with established ischemic heart disease. However, among clinically stable patients years after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or myocardial infarction (MI), the evidence supporting lifelong aspirin therapy is limited. At the same time, the risk of serious bleeding increases with age. DAN-RELEASE will therefore compare aspirin discontinuation with continued aspirin therapy in adults aged 65 years or older with stable ischemic heart disease who have remained free from ischemic events for at least two years. The trial will assess whether discontinuing aspirin is non-inferior to continued treatment with respect to cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes.
Rationale: Current guidelines recommend life-long aspirin therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. The evidence supporting long-term aspirin therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) and for chronic coronary syndrome stems primarily from trials conducted in the 1970s and 1980s. Since then, the clinical landscape of MI has evolved markedly: The use of highly sensitive cardiac troponins has led to the diagnosis of smaller MIs, coinciding with a shift from predominantly large ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) to smaller non-STEMI. Acute revascularization is now a part of the routine care for MI and many patients with stable coronary artery disease undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Population risk factors have improved, and universal use of statins have contributed to plaque stabilization and reduces progression of disease. As a result, long-term prognosis in patients with MI and chronic coronary syndromes has markedly improved. Therefore, the absolute ischemic benefit of long-term aspirin therapy may be attenuated, while the risk of bleeding, particularly in older patients, remains clinically relevant. These developments warrant a contemporary re-evaluation of the life-long role of aspirin in long-term secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, especially in elderly patients with stable disease. Objective: To evaluate whether discontinuation of long-term aspirin in elderly patients with stable chronic coronary syndrome is non-inferior to continued aspirin therapy with respect to net clinical outcome. All clinical outcomes will be registry based except patient-reported outcomes. They will be assessed using questionnaires measuring bleeding symptoms, gastrointestinal discomfort, quality of life and lifestyle behaviour during follow-up. Trial design: Investigator-initiated, registry-based, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) non-inferiority trial with 1:1 allocation. The trial is conducted as a low-intervention clinical trial using nationwide Danish health registries as the primary data source. Risk-benefit considerations: Aspirin is widely used in secondary prevention and is available over the counter, reflecting its well established safety profile and the generally low risk associated with its use. Nevertheless, aspirin is associated with potential adverse effects, including bleeding, gastrointestinal discomfort, and clinically relevant drug interactions, particularly in elderly patients with comorbidities. Based on data from national health registries, the target population - older adults with stable chronic coronary syndrome - represents a clinically stable group with a low event rate of ischemic events. Given that lifelong aspirin therapy is often continued without systematic reassessment, there is a clear ethical justification for evaluating whether continuation remains beneficial - and safe - in an aging population with changing comorbidity profiles.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
7,000
Participants randomized to this intervention will continue their current daily low-dose aspirin therapy.
Participants randomized to this intervention will discontinue their current daily low-dose aspirin therapy.
Odense Universitetshospital
Odense, Denmark
Hierarchical Composite of Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events
A hierarchical composite endpoint using a win-ratio framework combining cardiovascular death, fatal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, Myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and bleeding events (BARC 3-5).
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year
Cardiovascular Death
Death due to a cardiovascular cause.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year
Fatal Bleeding (BARC Type 5)
Fatal bleeding classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 5.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year
Intracranial Bleeding (BARC Type 3c)
Intracranial bleeding classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3c.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year
Ischemic Stroke
Occurrence of ischemic stroke during follow-up.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year
Myocardial Infarction
Occurrence of myocardial infarction during follow-up.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year
Other Major Bleeding (BARC Types 3a and 3b)
Major bleeding classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3a or 3b.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year
All-Cause Mortality
Death from any cause during follow-up.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year
Hospitalization for Cardiovascular Causes
Hospitalization due to cardiovascular causes during follow-up.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year
Peptic Ulcer
Occurrence of peptic ulcer during follow-up.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year
Minor Bleeding
Patient-reported bleeding symptoms will be assessed using a modified version of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH/SSC-BAT). The questionnaire is used to collect information on bleeding symptoms not available from national health registries.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year
Abdominal Pain and Discomfort
Patient-reported abdominal pain and gastrointestinal discomfort during follow-up, including symptom burden and impact on daily life. Individual questionnaire items are assessed separately, and no overall scale score is calculated.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after randomization
Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)
Patient-reported health-related quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level) questionnaire. The descriptive system covers five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated on five levels, ranging from no problems (level 1) to extreme problems or inability (level 5), with higher levels indicating worse health status. The responses to the five dimensions are combined into a five-digit health state. The direct sum of the 5 individual dimension scores. Higher means worse health status. The EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst health imaginable and 100 represents the best health imaginable. Higher EQ VAS scores indicate better self-rated health.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after randomization
Angina Symptoms, Frequency, and Physical Limitations (Seattle Angina Questionnaire)
Patient-reported angina symptoms, frequency, and physical limitations assessed using the 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7). Scores are transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status and fewer limitations due to angina.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.