HENKA is a universal, whole-community, school-based program that aims to promote emotional well-being and prevent mental health problems among adolescents enrolled in 1st to 3rd year of Secondary Education (ESO) in Catalonia, Spain (approximately 12 to 16 years old), through the development of resilience. The programme's name takes its origin from the Japanese term Henka, meaning a positive and transformative change, reflecting its focus on fostering sustainable improvements in adolescents' socioemotional functioning.The program targets adolescents, their families and school professionals. Its effectiveness is being evaluated through a non-randomized, two-arm, cluster-controlled quantitative phase (intervention schools compared to control schools), combined with a qualitative phase using focus groups. The study builds on the HENKA Pilot study (Ethics Committee code PIC-85-22), which assessed the feasibility of the evaluation process, including the validity of the assessment instruments and participants' viability and acceptability, before scaling up the program to a larger population.
The quantitative phase uses school-level cluster sampling: recruitment was coordinated with the Department of Education and the Department of Health of the Government of Catalonia, and schools voluntarily enrolled in either the HENKA intervention group (target at least 100 schools) or the control group (target at least 25 schools), depending on whether they formalized full participation in the program or chose to take part in the evaluation component only. The first-year secondary school cohort served as the sampling cluster, with additional cohorts progressively enrolled across successive academic years, starting in 2023-2024, until the target sample size was reached; each cohort was followed longitudinally until the third year of secondary school. The intervention comprises student training, consisting of eight approximately 55-minute classroom sessions covering self-efficacy/self-esteem, emotional self-regulation, assertiveness, interpersonal skills, and mindfulness. This training is delivered by teachers during school hours, and the teachers have previously received training from specialist staff (train-the-trainer program). In some sessions, teachers are accompanied by Community Emotional Well-being Representatives (RBEC), health professionals provided by the Department of Health who support classroom delivery and help identify and manage mental-health-related situations among students. Families attend parent workshops. Control schools continue with their usual mental health talks and resources and are offered the HENKA materials after the study ends. Results are assessed through validated online questionnaires (Research Electronic Data Capture, REDCap) at up to six time points over three academic years. A sample size calculation performed a priori with G\*Power 3.1.9.7 (effect size 0.2, alpha 0.05, power 0.95) indicated a minimum of 1,084 participants (542 per control and intervention group). In addition, a qualitative phase is conducted through focus groups with each participant segment (adolescents, families, educational professionals, and key regional well-being stakeholders from the Wellbeing for Being Well Program (BxB), the Community Emotional Well-being Representatives program (RBEC), and the Health and School Program (PSiE), held during the second and third trimesters of the 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 academic years, to explore participants' experiences and perspectives on the HENKA program.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,084
A universal, whole-community, school-based program to promote resilience and prevent mental health problems among adolescents. The program comprises eight approximately 55-minute classroom sessions covering self-efficacy/self-esteem, emotional self-regulation, assertiveness, interpersonal skills and mindfulness, delivered by teachers previously trained through the HENKA train-the-trainer program. In some sessions, teachers are accompanied by Community Emotional Well-being Representatives (RBEC), health professionals provided by the Department of Health who support classroom delivery and help identify and manage mental-health-related situations among students. Families are offered a parent workshop.
Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona / Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu
Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Change in Resilience - adolescents
Resilience Scale for Adolescents (READ), 28 items, mean item score, theoretical range 1- 5. Higher scores indicate greater resilience.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in Resilience - families
Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA-33), 33 items, mean item score, theoretical range 1- 5. Higher scores indicate greater resilience.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in school resilience - educational professionals
School Resilience Scale (SRS), 20 items, mean item score, theoretical range 1- 5. Higher scores indicate greater school resilience.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in coping strategies - adolescents
Coping Strategies Scale for Adolescents (EA-A), 13 items (3 subscales: positive thinking/problem-solving 7 items, family support-seeking 3 items, peer support-seeking 3 items), mean item score, theoretical range 1- 5. Higher scores indicate greater use of adaptive coping strategies.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in assertiveness - adolescents
Assertive Interpersonal Schema Questionnaire (AISQ), 21 items, sum score, theoretical range 21- 115. Higher scores indicate greater assertiveness.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in perceived self-efficacy - adolescents
General Self-Efficacy Scale (EAG), 10 items, mean item score, theoretical range 1- 5. Higher scores indicate greater perceived self-efficacy.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in empathy - adolescents
Basic Empathy Scale, brief version (BES-B), 9 items, mean item score, theoretical range 1- 5. Higher scores indicate greater empathy.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in emotional repair - adolescents
Trait Meta-Mood Scale, emotional repair subscale (TMMS-24), 8 items, mean item score, theoretical range 1- 5. Higher scores indicate better emotional repair.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in psychological well-being/distress - adolescents
General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), 12 items, sum score (binary scoring method), theoretical range 0- 12. Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress (worse outcome).
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in generalized anxiety - adolescents
Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), 7 items, sum score, theoretical range 0-21. Higher scores indicate greater severity of generalized anxiety symptoms (worse outcome).
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in depression - adolescents
Patient Health Questionnaire for adolescents (PHQ-9), 9 items, sum score, theoretical range 0- 27. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms (worse outcome).
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in school resilience - adolescents
School Resilience Scale (SRS), 20 items,mean item score, theoretical range 1- 5. Higher scores indicate greater school resilience.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in positive parenting functioning - families
Parental Functioning Scale (EFP), 12 items, 3 subscales (communication-interaction, affective bond, co-parenting agreement), sum score, theoretical range 0- 6. Higher scores indicate better positive parenting functioning.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in family climate - families
Family Environment Scale (FES), 27 items, 3 subscales (cohesion, expressiveness, conflict), sum score, theoretical range 0- 27. Higher scores indicate better family climate.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in psychological well-being/distress - families
General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), 12 items, sum score (binary scoring method), theoretical range 0- 12. Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress (worse outcome).
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in perceived stress - families
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), 10 items, sum score, theoretical range 0- 40. Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress (worse outcome).
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in perception of student adjustment - educational professionals
Teacher's Perception of Students Scale (PROF-A), 14 items, mean item score, theoretical range 1- 10. Higher scores indicate more positive teacher-perceived student adjustment.
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in psychological well-being/distress - educational professionals
General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), 12 items, sum score (binary scoring method), theoretical range 0-12. Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress (worse outcome).
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Change in perceived stress - educational professionals
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), 10 items, sum score, theoretical range 0 - 40. Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress (worse outcome).
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3-month and 12-month follow-up
Adolescents' experiences and perspectives on the HENKA program
Themes identified from semi-structured focus group discussions with adolescents, analyzed using thematic analysis within a phenomenological framework.
Time frame: Second and third trimesters of the 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 academic years
Families' experiences and perspectives on the HENKA program
Themes identified from semi-structured focus group discussions with families, analyzed using thematic analysis within a phenomenological framework.
Time frame: Second and third trimesters of the 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 academic years
Educational professionals' experiences and perspectives on the HENKA program
Themes identified from semi-structured focus group discussions with educational professionals, analyzed using thematic analysis within a phenomenological framework.
Time frame: Second and third trimesters of the 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 academic years
Key regional well-being stakeholders' experiences and perspectives on the HENKA program
Themes identified from semi-structured focus group discussions with representatives of the Wellbeing for Being Well Program (BxB), the Community Emotional Well-being Representatives program (RBEC), and the Health and School Program (PSiE), analyzed using thematic analysis within a phenomenological framework.
Time frame: Second and third trimesters of the 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 academic years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.