Randomised Clinical Trial on 30 Class Lll Patients on Two Groups Each Group Consist of 15 Patient to Compare Between Face Mask and Ertty Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class Lll Deficient Maxilla.Acone Beam ct to Every Patient Before and After Treatment and a3D Ceph Traced to Every Patient.

Minia University30 enrolled

Overview

Randomised clinical trial on 30 class lll patients on two groups each group consist of 15 patient to compare between Face mask and Ertty Appliance in Treatment of skeletal class lll Deficient maxilla.acone beam ct to every patient before and after treatment and a3D ceph traced to every patient to compare the skeletal and dental effect of every applliance

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

Interventions

Protraction of maxilla using face mask applianceDEVICE

Protraction of maxilla using face mask appliance and compare the result with other group

Protraction of maxilla using Errty Gap applianceDEVICE

Protraction of maxilla using Errty Gap appliance and compare the result with another group

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 8 YearsMax age: 12 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * skeletal class lll patients with Deficient maxilla Exclusion Criteria: Free from any medical disease No previous orthodontic treatment

Locations (1)

Minia University

Minya, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Sagital position of maxilla after facemask treatment

Time frame: 9 months of treatment

Sagital position of maxilla after Ertty Gap treatment

Time frame: 9 months to complete treatment

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.