This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether an integrated online-offline multimodal teaching approach combining Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Case-Based Learning (CBL), and Case Three-Dimensional Teaching Method (CTTM) improves clinical self-efficacy and hands-on proficiency in managing endocrine and metabolic critical illness among internal medicine residents, compared to traditional lecture-based learning (LBL). Ninety internal medicine residents on their first endocrine rotation will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to three groups: (1) Control group receiving traditional LBL alone; (2) Experimental group 1 receiving PBL plus LBL; (3) Experimental group 2 receiving the integrated PBL-CBL-CTTM closed-loop teaching program. All groups receive a standardized 12-hour curriculum on endocrine and metabolic critical illness, including diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome, thyroid storm, and refractory hypoglycemia. The primary outcome is the clinical skills assessment score (0-50 points). Secondary outcomes include theoretical examination scores, General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) scores, a self-developed Endocrine High-Risk Management Self-Efficacy Source Questionnaire (four dimensions based on Bandura's self-efficacy theory), teaching satisfaction, and semi-structured focus group interviews. The study was conducted from September 2025 to August 2026 at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chaohu, China. This study aims to establish an evidence-based, replicable teaching model that addresses the gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical confidence in managing endocrine emergencies among residents.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
90
In-person one-way didactic lectures with self-directed review after class. Total 12-hour standardized curriculum on endocrine and metabolic critical illness, including diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome, thyroid storm, and refractory hypoglycemia.
Pre-class online problem-based learning (PBL) via DingTalk (open-ended critical case questions, independent literature search, online group discussion) plus standardized in-person lectures (LBL), with self-directed review after class. Total 12-hour standardized curriculum.
Integrated closed-loop teaching: pre-class online PBL (identical to experimental group 1) plus standardized in-person lectures plus post-class ward-based case-based learning (CBL) with attending-supervised hands-on critical case training, case three-dimensional teaching method (CTTM) resources, and post-class debriefing. Total 12-hour standardized curriculum.
The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Chaohu, Anhui, China
Clinical skills assessment score
Assessed by group-blinded evaluators using a standardized clinical skills checklist immediately after the 12-hour intervention. Total score range: 0-50 points. Higher scores indicate better clinical proficiency in managing endocrine and metabolic critical illness.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (upon completion of the 12-hour curriculum)
Theoretical examination score
Closed-book written examination graded by blinded faculty. Total score range: 0-50 points, covering endocrine and metabolic critical illness knowledge.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) score
10-item standardized self-efficacy scale (Cronbach's α=0.89), completed anonymously. Higher scores indicate greater general self-efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately post-intervention
Endocrine High-Risk Management Self-Efficacy Source Questionnaire score
Self-developed 4-dimension questionnaire based on Bandura's self-efficacy theory (mastery experience, vicarious learning, verbal persuasion, positive affect; Cronbach's α=0.81, CVI=0.92), completed anonymously.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately post-intervention
Teaching satisfaction scale score
5-dimension teaching satisfaction scale (recognition rate and mean score), completed anonymously.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention
Focus group interview themes
Semi-structured focus group interviews (30-40 minutes each) with 24 residents selected via stratified purposive sampling, analyzed using Braun \& Clarke six-step thematic analysis method. Explores residents' experiences and psychological mechanisms underlying changes in clinical self-efficacy.
Time frame: Within 1 week post-intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.