This is an international multi-centre, non-inferiority phase III randomized controlled trial comparing concurrent chemoradiation with high dose cisplatin (Arm A) vs. hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Arm B) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
This is an interventional randomized study in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , i twill compare between 2 arms (concurrent chemoradiation with high dose cisplatin (Arm A) vs. hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Arm B)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
604
70 Gy 35 fractions/7weeks+high dose of cisplatin
81.6 Gy /68 fractions BID FOR 7 WEEKS
King Hussein Cancer Center
Amman, Jordan
RECRUITINGOVERALL SURVIVAL
To determine if hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Arm B) has a non-inferior overall survival (OS) compared to concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with high dose cisplatin every 3 weeks (Arm A) in patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
Time frame: 7 YEARS
Oncologic outcomes
To compare between arms the following: Oncologic outcomes: loco-regional failure (LRF)
Time frame: 7 YEARS
Change in hearing threshold levels as assessed by pure tone audiometry
Hearing threshold levels will be measured using pure tone audiometry across standard audiometric frequencies. Changes from baseline hearing thresholds will be assessed and compared between study groups
Time frame: 7 YEARS
Treatment-related toxicity/adverse events
Treatment-related toxicity/adverse events: physician-assessed toxicities: National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.5
Time frame: 7 YEARS
Change from baseline in Head and Neck Cancer-specific quality of life as assessed by the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire
Patient-reported quality of life and swallowing-related quality of life will be assessed using the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) . Questionnaire with higher scores indicating better quality of life and swallowing function. Change from baseline scores will be evaluated at predefined study time points
Time frame: 7 YEARS
Distant metastasis (DM) rate between treatment arms
he occurrence of distant metastases will be assessed and compared between study arms during the study follow-up period
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: From randomisation till 7 years for each study participant
disease-free survival (DFS)
Disease-free survival (DFS) will be defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease recurrence (local, regional, or distant) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first
Time frame: 7 years
Change from baseline in ototoxicity severity as assessed by the Modified TUNE grading scale
Ototoxicity severity will be evaluated using the Modified TUNE grading scale. The scale grades hearing impairment severity based on audiologic assessment findings. Changes from baseline grading scores will be assessed and compared at predefined study time points, with higher grades indicating worse ototoxicity.
Time frame: 7 years
Change from baseline in speech recognition as assessed by Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores
Speech recognition ability will be evaluated using speech audiometry with Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word testing. CNC word scores will be reported as the percentage of correctly identified words, with higher scores indicating better speech recognition performance. Changes from baseline scores will be assessed at predefined study time points
Time frame: 7 years
Number of participants with abnormal tympanometry findings
Tympanometry will be performed to assess middle ear function. Tympanogram results will be classified according to standard tympanogram types, and the number of participants with abnormal findings will be reported at predefined study time points.
Time frame: 7 years
Treatment-related toxicity/adverse events-PRO
Treatment-related toxicity/adverse events: patient-reported toxicity: Patient Reported Outcomes - Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (PRO CTCAE) v1.
Time frame: 7 years
Patient-reported outcomes (PRO):UW-QOL
Patient-reported outcomes (PRO): instrument \[University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL)\]
Time frame: 7 years
Patient-reported outcomes (PRO): MDADI
swallowing-related PRO \[M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)\]
Time frame: 7 Years
Change from baseline in Head and Neck Cancer-specific quality of life as assessed by the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)
Patient-reported quality of life and swallowing-related quality of life will be assessed using the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Questionnaire with higher scores indicating better quality of life and swallowing function. Change from baseline scores will be evaluated at predefined study time points
Time frame: 7 years