The AK ACE-PATH Phase II study aims to pilot and implement a novel intervention, Tools for Arctic Health Promotion (TAHP), to address Alaska Native (AN) community priorities related to local health and community-level resilience.
In Phase I of AK ACE, community partners identified and prioritized local stressors through a consensus-based process. Building on these findings, Phase II will implement interventions targeting the highest-priority stressors through modules designed to improve health outcomes.This study addresses a critical gap in understanding local health and mental health among AN populations facing rapid social change and overlapping public health challenges. The project focuses on developing community-driven solutions to improve physiological and mental health, particularly among youth, and to prevent chronic disease across the lifespan in rural Alaska. To achieve these goals, the study will develop and implement Tools for Arctic Health Promotion (TAHP), a novel intervention integrating data-driven tools and evidence-based community strategies. TAHP will support structured community engagement and deliver manualized health activities to approximately 410 adults and youth across five rural AN communities. The TAHP intervention will be evaluated through a feasibility pilot in one community and a paired dynamic waitlisted design (DWLD) across four additional communities. Behavioral and biological measures will assess individual- and community-level impacts on chronic disease prevention and mental health promotion.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
360
The TAHP intervention will utilize a valid measure of rural AN community-level protective factors (Allen, et al., 2025), and an evidence-based toolkit containing strategies proven to increase mental health and well-being in rural AN communities (Allen, Charles, et al., 2023). A formalized community engaged process will generate new intervention activities that integrate cutting-edge science to address local health priorities.
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Fairbanks, Alaska, United States
Perceived Stress Scale Questionnaire will measure individual-level indicators of stress that we hypothesize will decrease over time with intervention participation
The NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Scale is a standardized tool designed to assess how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded individuals feel in their lives. We will analyze how individual stress indicators are mitigated over time by intervention participation.
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)
General Life Satisfaction Scale will measure individual level indicators of life satisfaction that we hypothesize will increase with intervention participation
The NIH Toolbox General Life Satisfaction Scale is a tool designed to assess an individual's cognitive evaluation of their life experiences and overall satisfaction. We will assess how the intervention mitigates life satisfaction with individuals who participate.
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)
We will assess if depression decreases with intervention participation using the PHQ-9 Questionnaire
The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) measures the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia over the past two weeks. We will assess how the intervention impacts depressive symptoms with individual participation.
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)
We will assess if anxiety symptoms decrease with intervention participation using the GAD-7
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Screener will be given at every time point to assess how the intervention mitigates anxiety with individual participants
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)
We will assess if food security increases using the food security index from the PhenX Toolkit
The PhenX Toolkit includes standardized measures for assessing food security, which is crucial for understanding social determinants of health. We will use items from the standardized food security tools to evaluate how food access impacts health outcomes and if food security increases with individual participation in the intervention.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)
We will assess if cultural efficacy increases with individual intervention participation using the Cultural Efficacy Scale.
The Cultural Efficacy Scale developed by Gonzalez, Sittner, and Walls in 2022 measures individuals' comfort and access to cultural and traditional resources, particularly within Indigenous communities. This scale consists of 7-8 items, each with a range of response options from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." We will analyze the data to link cultural efficacy with mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety), highlighting the protective effects of engagement in the intervention.
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)
We will assess how the intervention increases individual protective factors using the Multi-Cultural Mastery Scale
The Multicultural Mastery Scale, developed by Allen and Mohatt, assesses coping strategies through self-mastery and communal mastery dimensions. It includes subscales that differentiate between mastery related to family and friends, highlighting the importance of social networks. We will utilize data from this scale to determine how the intervention increases positive coping and builds social networks connections in individuals who participate.
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)
We will assess how intervention participation increases social and cultural connectedness using the Awareness of Connectedness Scale
The Awareness of Connectedness Scale (ACS), developed by Mohatt and Fok, measures an individual's awareness of their interrelatedness with family, community, and the natural environment. This scale is particularly focused on cultural aspects of wellness and healing among Alaska Native people, providing insights into their social and ecological connections. We will utilize data from the scale to assess the intervention impacts on building connectedness among individual participants.
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)
We will assess how the intervention increases reasons for life and meaning and purpose using the Reasons for Life Scale
The Reasons for Life Scale (RFL), developed by Allen and Rasmus, focuses on cultural strengths and protective factors against suicide, particularly among Alaska Native people. It emphasizes resilience, cultural teachings, and community recognition as vital components in promoting mental health and preventing suicide. We will utilize data from scale to assess how the intervention promotes reasons for life and associates with mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety) in individuals who participate in activities.
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)
We will assess the increase in community-level factors that are protective and contribute to health outcomes using the Protective Community Scale
The Protective Community Scale (PCS), developed by Wexler, Allen, and Rasmus, aims to identify community-level protective factors that can reduce suicide risk among Alaska Native youth. This scale is part of a broader effort to enhance resilience in these communities through culturally relevant measures and community engagement. We will analyze data from the PCS to determine if the intervention has mitigated environmental stressors and increased community protection.
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), 4 months (T1), 8 months (T2) and at 20 months (T3)