The aim of this study is to investigate the amount of surface wear that may occur during treatment with different composite materials used for clear aligner attachments. Two different flowable composites (AlignerFlow LC, VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany; AlignerConnect, GC, Tokyo, Japan) will be used to bond the attachments in split mouth designs. To determine the composite for the upper right segment, a coin toss will be performed. The remaining quadrants will be bonded with alternate composite resin. After bonding, intraoral scans will be performed from baseline to 6 months for every 2 months. Stl files obtained from the scans will be imported to NemoStudio, to evaluate the volume loss of the attachments.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
35
Patient's upper right segment will be bonded with GC Aligner Connect. Upper left VOCO, lower left GC, lower right VOCO.
Patient's upper right segment will be bonded with VOCO AlignerFlow LC. Upper left GC, lower left VOCO, lower right GC
Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Within-patient difference between composites in volume wear
After importing stl files to NemoStudio software, T0 (without attachments), T1(immediately after bonding) and T4(6 months) scans will be superimposed using surface registration. Using Booleans extractions, T0 model will be removed from T1 and T4, leaving only the attachments. Software will calculate the volumes of attachments in mm³.
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.