The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a personalized, brain-scan-guided form of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) works better than a standard TMS approach at changing reward-related brain activity in adults who smoke cigarettes. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does personalized TMS produce a greater change in reward-related brain activity than the standard approach? Does personalized TMS lead to a greater reduction in cravings and cigarette smoking than the standard approach? Researchers will compare personalized TMS, which targets a treatment location chosen from each participant's own brain scan, to a standard TMS approach, which targets a location based on anatomical landmarks, to see if the personalized approach produces stronger effects on brain reward activity and smoking behavior. Participants will: Complete an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scan and questionnaires about their smoking habits and mood Be randomly assigned to receive either personalized TMS or the standard TMS approach Attend 15 TMS treatment sessions over 3 weeks (Monday through Friday), including brain wave (EEG) recordings and craving check-ins before and after each session Return for follow-up visits 1 week and 1 month after finishing treatment
People with tobacco use disorder often show changes in how their brain responds to rewards. A brain region involved in this process can be measured using a brain wave (EEG) signal that reflects how strongly the brain reacts to rewards. This study looks at whether a personalized form of brain stimulation can shift that signal more effectively than a standard approach. The personalized approach, Pathway-precise Reward Intervention via Midcingulate Engagement (PRIME) TMS uses each participant's own brain scan to find the stimulation location that is most strongly connected to the brain's reward center, rather than using the same general location for everyone. Stimulation is also paired with a short reward-based computer task during the session, based on the idea that engaging the brain's reward system during stimulation may strengthen its effects. The standard approach uses a fixed stimulation location based on external head landmarks and is delivered without any task. Participants are randomly assigned to one of the two approaches, similar to a coin flip, with the assignment balanced to make sure both groups have similar mixes of smoking severity and mood symptoms. Both groups receive the same number of sessions (15), on the same schedule (weekdays for 3 weeks), and the same strength and dose of stimulation. The only differences are where the stimulation is delivered and whether participants complete a task during it. Study visits include an initial screening, a brain scan to plan the intervention, a baseline visit with brain wave recording and questionnaires, the three weeks of stimulation sessions, a follow-up assessment shortly after the sessions end, and two brief check-in calls at 1 week and 1 month later. Throughout the study, the research team monitors participants closely for side effects using standardized safety checklists, and all equipment used (the stimulation device, positioning system, brain wave recorder, and MRI scanner) is already cleared by the FDA for other uses. The study will compare how much each approach changes brain reward activity, cravings, and smoking amounts, and will look at whether changes in brain activity help explain any changes in cravings or smoking behavior.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
54
Repetitive TMS (10 Hz, 3,000 pulses per session, 110% resting motor threshold) delivered via a figure-8 coil using robotic neuronavigation. The stimulation target is an individualized dorsolateral prefrontal cortex location identified from each participant's diffusion-weighted MRI as having maximal structural connectivity to the midcingulate cortex. Delivered over 15 sessions across 3 weeks, concurrently with a brief reward-based cognitive task performed during inter-train intervals.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10 Hz, 3,000 pulses per session, 110% resting motor threshold) delivered via a figure-8 coil using robotic neuronavigation. The stimulation target is a dorsolateral prefrontal cortex location identified using standardized anatomical landmarks on structural MRI, without individualized connectivity mapping. Delivered over 15 sessions across 3 weeks, without a concurrent cognitive task.
Rutgers University Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience
Newark, New Jersey, United States
RECRUITINGChange in Reward Positivity Amplitude
Reward positivity, an event-related potential (ERP) component measured via EEG during a virtual T-maze reward task, reflecting midcingulate cortex sensitivity to reward. Change from baseline to post-intervention will be compared between the PRIME TMS and Standard TMS arms.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to Session 1) and Day 19 (within 3 days following completion of the 15-TMS sessions course), approximately Weeks 1 and 6
Change in Tobacco Craving Questionnaire (TCQ) Score
Multidimensional self-report measure of cigarette craving, including emotionality, expectancy, compulsivity, and purposefulness subscales. Total score ranges from 12 to 84 (4 subscales, ranging from 3 to 21), with higher scores indicating greater craving
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to Session 1) and Day 19 (within 3 days following completion of the 15-session course), with follow-up at approximately Week 1 and Week 6.
Change in Questionnaire of Smoking Urges-Brief (QSU-B) Score
10-item Self-report measure of urge to smoke, assessing hedonic craving and anticipated relief from negative affect/withdrawal. Total score ranges from 10 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater urge to smoke.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to Session 1) and Day 19 (within 3 days following completion of the 15-TMS session course), with follow-up at approximately Week 1 and Week 6.
Change in Daily Cigarette Consumption
Self-reported cigarettes smoked per day, captured via daily tobacco diary and Timeline Follow-Back interview, corroborated with breath carbon monoxide level.
Time frame: Baseline through 1-month follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.