The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to compare different resin composite layering techniques (monochromatic, complex multichromatic, and single-shaded structurally-colored composite) using 3D printed casts for the restoration of Class IV anterior tooth fractures. The study will evaluate shade matching, overall clinical performance, and patient satisfaction over a 12-month follow-up period.
Restoration of anterior fractured teeth (Class IV) presents an aesthetic and technical challenge in restorative dentistry. While direct composite restorations have traditionally relied on free-hand or conventional putty index techniques, recent advances in digital dentistry allow for 3D digital design software and 3D printed casts to create precise palatal guides and optimize anatomical contours and occlusion. This prospective clinical trial involves 27 adult patients requiring Class IV restorations. Patients are categorized into three equal intervention groups (n=9 each) based on the application technique and resin composite system used: monochromatic layering, complex multichromatic layering, and single-shaded structurally-colored composite. Primary impressions and digital surface scans will be obtained to design missing tooth structures digitally and fabricate 3D printed models. Restoration shade selection will be conducted using both visual and DSLR digital photography techniques. All clinical restorations will be evaluated at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months using FDI criteria for clinical performance and shade matching, alongside self-reported patient satisfaction metrics.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
27
Application of resin composite restorations on anterior Class IV fractures using three different layering protocols (monochromatic, complex multichromatic, and single-shaded structurally colored composite) guided by 3D printed casts.
Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
Shade Matching
Evaluation of color match between the resin composite restoration and adjacent natural tooth structure using visual assessment and DSLR digital photography evaluated by FDI criteria.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Overall Clinical Performance
Assessment of clinical criteria including marginal adaptation, surface texture, fracture/retention, and anatomical form evaluated according to FDI criteria.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Patient Satisfaction
Evaluation of patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic appearance, shade match, and overall treatment outcome assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where scores range from 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied), with higher scores indicating better satisfaction.
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.