Real-World Study of Obstructive Upper Urinary Tract Stones and Acute Pyelonephritis

Overview

Upper urinary tract stone obstruction complicated by acute pyelonephritis is a critical urological emergency requiring urgent decompression and infection control, yet real-world clinical decisions regarding the choice between retrograde ureteral stenting, percutaneous nephrostomy, or initial antibiotic therapy often vary based on physician experience and resource availability. This prospective, multi-center, observational study aims to enroll 1,650 patients across more than 30 hospitals in China to systematically evaluate the technical success rates, infection control efficacy, and safety profiles of these different management strategies. By analyzing natural clinical cohorts without intervening in routine practice, the study seeks to define the optimal application boundaries for retrograde stenting, evaluate the role of nephrostomy as a primary or salvage treatment, and establish risk models to predict the failure of conservative antibiotic therapy, ultimately providing high-level evidence for individualized and precise clinical decision-making.

Although current clinical consensus suggests that both percutaneous nephrostomy and retrograde ureteral stenting are effective for decompressing the upper urinary tract, real-world data suggest that retrograde stenting is chosen in the vast majority of cases due to its minimally invasive nature, leaving a critical knowledge gap regarding its specific failure risk factors and the precise indications for primary nephrostomy. Furthermore, a subset of patients who meet drainage criteria are initially treated with antibiotics alone due to non-medical factors such as patient preference or resource constraints, but the safety and failure boundaries of this conservative approach have not been well-documented. This study is designed as a prospective observational cohort study where 1,650 patients will be naturally assigned to treatment cohorts based on the initial clinical decision, including initial retrograde stenting, initial nephrostomy, or initial antibiotic therapy. Participants must present with CT-confirmed unilateral stone obstruction, fever or chills, and signs of systemic inflammation or organ dysfunction to ensure a well-defined study population. The researchers will record detailed baseline data including stone characteristics, infection severity scores, and a unique physician-based subjective risk assessment to capture the nuances of clinical decision-making logic in real-time. The primary endpoint is the technical success rate of retrograde ureteral stenting, while secondary endpoints include the time to clinical stability, 30-day major complication rates, salvage treatment requirements, and renal function recovery metrics measured by creatinine and glomerular filtration rate changes. To address the expected sample size imbalance between treatment groups, the statistical analysis plan will utilize propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting to ensure robust comparisons. Ultimately, the study will develop visualization tools such as nomograms to predict the failure of retrograde stenting and conservative treatment, bridging the gap between clinical guidelines and real-world emergency management to improve patient safety and resource allocation.