Physical activity can improve health-related quality of life among people receiving cancer treatment. Yet, chemotherapy imposes considerable barriers to maintaining an active lifestyle. Emotion regulation-based approaches based on principles from Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may help people engage in physical activity despite treatment-related challenges. We aimed to develop and conduct a proof of concept study among people initiating chemotherapy for breast and gynecologic cancers to develop and assess the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, mobile health physical activity intervention that drew from SDT and ACT principles.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
42
This intervention will be delivered over the course of up to 8-12 weeks. It will include: 1) the provision of a wearable physical activity tracker 2) empirically supported behavior change techniques for promoting physical activity 3) Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-informed didactic content centered on promoting physical activity 4) a social component with game design elements reflecting acceptance and mindfulness practices (i.e., the ability to share responses to "Weekly Challenges" and view and comment on others' entries).
TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Semi-structured Interviews
Semi-structured interviews will be used to assess participants' overall experience and their perceptions of the usability, usefulness, and enjoyability of the intervention.
Time frame: 9 weeks
Perceived ease of use
Face valid questions will be used to determine whether participants found the interventions easy to use. The face valid questions consists of five 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All Easy" (scored as 1) to "Very Easy" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater ease of use.
Time frame: Week 9
Perceived Usefulness
Face valid questions will be used to determine whether participants found the interventions useful. The face valid questions consists of five 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All Useful" (scored as 1) to "Very Useful" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater perceived usefulness.
Time frame: Week 9
Enjoyability
Face valid questions will be used to assess the enjoyability of the interventions in this study. The face valid questions consists of five 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All Enjoyable" (scored as 1) to "Very Enjoyable" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater enjoyability.
Time frame: Week 9
Enjoyability - Interest/Enjoyment Subscale
The interest/enjoyment subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMIe) will be used to assess the enjoyability of the interventions in this study. The IMIe sub-scale consists of seven 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All True" (scored as 1) to "Very True" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater enjoyability.
Time frame: Week 9
Feasibility of the Program - Study Retention
We will assess program feasibility via measurements of study retention. We will compute what percentage of enrolled participant complete post-intervention data collection procedures.
Time frame: Week 9
Feasibility of the Program - Adherence
We will assess program feasibility via measurements of intervention adherence. We will compute what percentage of participants engage with at least 75% of the intervention modules.
Time frame: Week 9
Feasibility of Collecting Biological Samples
We will assess the feasibility of assessing gene expression in the present context by assessing what percentage of enrolled participants provide analyzable data in optional post-intervention blood draws.
Time frame: Week 9
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.