This prospective randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether DeepMedFake improves the identification of medical images that require further verification. DeepMedFake is an artificial intelligence-based medical image analysis system that provides an image-authenticity risk assessment, a patient-image consistency risk assessment and a recommendation regarding further verification. Hospital physicians and healthcare audit professionals will participate in a randomized two-period crossover design. Each participant will assess one case set with DeepMedFake assistance and the other without AI assistance. The primary outcome in each cohort is the sensitivity of the final verification decision, evaluated separately in the hospital clinical and healthcare audit cohorts.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
64
DeepMedFake is an artificial intelligence-based medical image analysis system designed to support the detection of synthetic medical images and authentic medical images paired with discordant patient information. It provides an image-authenticity risk assessment, a patient-image consistency risk assessment and a recommendation regarding further verification. In this study, DeepMedFake is used as a decision-support tool to assist participants in determining whether the image requires further verification before downstream clinical or healthcare audit use. Final judgments and verification decisions are made by the participants.
Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Reader Performance With and Without DeepMedFake Assistance: Sensitivity of the Final Verification Decision in the Hospital Clinical Cohort
The percentage of reference-standard abnormal cases assigned to further verification by hospital physicians will be estimated under DeepMedFake-assisted and unassisted review. The effect measure is the absolute percentage-point difference between review conditions.
Time frame: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
Reader Performance With and Without DeepMedFake Assistance: Sensitivity of the Final Verification Decision in the Healthcare Audit Cohort
The percentage of reference-standard abnormal cases assigned to further verification by healthcare audit professionals will be estimated under DeepMedFake-assisted and unassisted review. The effect measure is the absolute percentage-point difference between review conditions.
Time frame: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
Reader Performance With and Without DeepMedFake Assistance: Specificity of the Final Verification Decision in the Hospital Clinical Cohort
The percentage of authentic, information-matched cases assigned to no further verification by hospital physicians will be estimated under each review condition and compared between conditions.
Time frame: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
Reader Performance With and Without DeepMedFake Assistance: Specificity of the Final Verification Decision in the Healthcare Audit Cohort
The percentage of authentic, information-matched cases assigned to no further verification by healthcare audit professionals will be estimated under each review condition and compared between conditions.
Time frame: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
Sensitivity of the Final Verification Decision for Synthetic Medical Image Cases
The percentage of reference-standard synthetic-image cases assigned to further verification will be estimated under each review condition. DeepMedFake-assisted and unassisted review will be compared separately within the hospital clinical and healthcare audit cohorts.
Time frame: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
Sensitivity of the Final Verification Decision in Discordant Cases
The percentage of authentic images paired with discordant patient information that are assigned to further verification will be estimated under each review condition. DeepMedFake-assisted and unassisted review will be compared separately within the hospital clinical and healthcare audit cohorts.
Time frame: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
Sensitivity of the Image-Authenticity Judgment
The percentage of reference-standard synthetic-image cases classified as suspected synthetic images will be estimated under each review condition and compared separately within each reader cohort.
Time frame: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
Specificity of the Image-Authenticity Judgment
The percentage of reference-standard authentic-image cases classified as not suspected to be synthetic will be estimated under each review condition and compared separately within each reader cohort.
Time frame: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
Sensitivity of the Patient-Image Consistency Judgment
Among authentic images, the percentage of discordant cases classified as discordant with the displayed patient information will be estimated under each review condition and compared separately within each reader cohort. Synthetic-image cases will be excluded from this analysis.
Time frame: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
Specificity of the Patient-Image Consistency Judgment
Among authentic images, the percentage of information-matched cases classified as matching the displayed patient information will be estimated under each review condition and compared separately within each reader cohort. Synthetic-image cases will be excluded from this analysis.
Time frame: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
Case-Level Workflow Time
Elapsed time in seconds from successful case loading to submission of the final required case-level response, including selection of a proposed first verification pathway when required. Recorded pauses will be excluded. Workflow time will be compared between review conditions separately within each reader cohort.
Time frame: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.