This prospective, real-world observational study (T2AIR Study) evaluates the long-term efficacy and safety of six biologics targeting Type 2 inflammation - omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, tezepelumab, and depemokimab - in patients with chronic airway diseases, including asthma and COPD under routine clinical practice in China. The primary objective is to determine the annualized exacerbation rate (AER) over 12 months of treatment. Secondary objectives include time to first exacerbation, frequency of severe exacerbations, improvements in symptom control and quality of life (using disease-specific questionnaires), lung function (FEV₁, FVC), airway inflammatory biomarkers (FeNO, blood eosinophils, serum IgE), oral corticosteroid (OCS) sparing effect in asthma patients, and treatment persistence. Safety outcomes will assess the incidence, types, and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Exploratory endpoints include high-resolution CT (HRCT)-based imaging markers of airway remodeling and the development of deep learning-based multimodal predictive models integrating clinical, biomarker, and radiomics data to support personalized treatment. Additionally, blood, sputum, and urine samples will be collected for translational research to explore underlying mechanisms and predictors of biologic response. This study aims to generate robust real-world evidence on the effectiveness and safety of Type 2-targeted biologics across the broad spectrum of chronic airway diseases in a diverse Chinese patient population.
Chronic airway diseases, encompassing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are heterogeneous disorders characterized by chronic airway inflammation, persistent airflow limitation, and/or airway hyperresponsiveness. These conditions commonly present with chronic cough, sputum production, and dyspnea. Acute exacerbations can be life-threatening and represent a leading global cause of disability and premature mortality among chronic non-communicable diseases. Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with long-acting bronchodilators (LABA/LAMA) form the mainstay of treatment, a substantial proportion of patients - approximately 5-10% with asthma and selected COPD patients experience severe or refractory disease. These patients suffer from recurrent exacerbations, progressive lung function decline, impaired quality of life, and serious complications associated with long-term oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, including osteoporosis and increased infection risk. Type 2 (T2-high) inflammation, driven by eosinophil activation and the IL-4/IL-5/IL-13 signaling pathways, plays a central role in the pathogenesis of most severe asthma cases and a significant subset of COPD patients. In recent years, biologics targeting key mediators of Type 2 inflammation - including IgE, IL-5/IL-5Rα, IL-4Rα, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) - have emerged as precision therapeutic options for patients inadequately controlled on standard therapy. The six biologics evaluated in this study are: 1. Omalizumab (anti-IgE monoclonal antibody) 2. Mepolizumab (anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody) 3. Benralizumab (anti-IL-5Rα monoclonal antibody) 4. Dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody, blocking IL-4/IL-13 signaling) 5. Tezepelumab (anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody, effective in both T2-high and T2-low phenotypes) 6. Depemokimab (ultra-long-acting anti-IL-5 Fc-fusion protein enabling twice-yearly dosing) Current international guidelines (GINA 2026 and GOLD 2026) recommend these Type 2-targeted biologics as add-on therapy for moderate-to-severe patients with poor control despite optimized standard care, with selection often guided by biomarkers such as blood eosinophils (EOS) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). While these agents have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for severe asthma and eosinophilic COPD, robust real-world evidence remains limited, long-term use, diverse phenotypes, elderly patients, and those with multiple comorbidities. Moreover, data specific to Chinese populations are scarce. This prospective real-world observational study aims to address these evidence gaps.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
538
Biologics targeting Type 2 inflammation, including Omalizumab (anti-IgE monoclonal antibody), Mepolizumab (anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody), Benralizumab (anti-IL-5Rα monoclonal antibody), Dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody, blocking IL-4/IL-13 signaling), Tezepelumab (anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody, effective in both T2-high and T2-low phenotypes), Depemokimab (ultra-long-acting anti-IL-5 Fc-fusion protein enabling twice-yearly dosing)
Patients with asthma and copd who received standard of care as recommended by relevant guidelines
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
RECRUITINGAnnual rate of protocol-defined exacerbations of chronic airway disease over 12 months
Number of protocol-defined exacerbations per participant-year during the 12-month follow-up. An exacerbation is defined according to the disease-specific international criteria applicable to the participant's primary diagnosis: GINA 2026 for asthma; GOLD 2026 for COPD; ERS 2025 for bronchiectasis; and ERS 2024 for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). Events are ascertained from participant report, medical records, and investigator assessment at scheduled and unscheduled visits.
Time frame: 12 months
Time to first exacerbation;
Exacerbations of chronic airway diseases as defined by international guidelines: GINA 2026 (asthma) and GOLD 2026 (COPD).
Time frame: 12 months
Frequency of severe exacerbations
Severe exacerbations of chronic airway diseases as defined by international guidelines: GINA 2026 (asthma), GOLD 2026 (COPD), ERS 2025 (bronchiectasis), and ERS 2024 (ABPA)
Time frame: 12 months
Change from baseline in Asthma Control Test (ACT) total score at 3, 6, 9, 12 months
The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a 5-item patient-reported questionnaire assessing asthma control over the previous 4 weeks. Total score ranges from 5 to 25; higher scores indicate better asthma control. Change is calculated as 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score.
Time frame: 12 months
Change from baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) score at 3, 6, 9, 12 months
The Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) assesses asthma symptom control. Each of 6 items is scored from 0 to 6; the total score is the mean of item scores and ranges from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate worse asthma control. Change is 12-month score minus baseline score.
Time frame: 12 months
Change from baseline in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) total score at 3, 6, 9, 12 months
The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is an 8-item questionnaire. Total score ranges from 0 to 40; higher scores indicate worse health status. Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score.
Time frame: 12 months
Change from baseline in modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale at 3, 6, 9, 12 months
The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale ranges from 0 to 4; higher scores indicate more severe dyspnea. Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month grade minus baseline grade.
Time frame: 12 months
Change from baseline in Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptoms Score (QoL-B RSS) at 3, 6, 9, 12 months
The Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) Respiratory Symptoms Score is a domain of the QoL-B questionnaire. Domain scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate fewer respiratory symptoms / better health status. Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score. This instrument is only measured for patients with bronchiectasis.
Time frame: 12 months
Change from baseline in Bronchiectasis Impact Measure (BIM) total score at 12 months
The Bronchiectasis Impact Measure (BIM) is a patient-reported instrument assessing the impact of bronchiectasis. Total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater disease impact (worse outcome). Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score. This instrument is only measured for patients with bronchiectasis.
Time frame: 12 months
Change from baseline in Bronchiectasis Symptom Visual Analog Scale (BS-VAS) score at 3, 6, 9, 12 months
The Bronchiectasis Symptom Visual Analog Scale (BS-VAS) measures overall bronchiectasis symptom burden on a 10-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score. This instrument is only measured for patients with bronchiectasis.
Time frame: 12 months
Change from baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at 3, 6, 9, 12 months
The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life. Administered to participants with asthma or COPD, and to participants with ABPA who have comorbid asthma. Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score.
Time frame: 12 months
Lung function parameters
Lung function parameters (FEV₁, FVC, and FEV₁/FVC ratio);
Time frame: 12 months
Airway inflammation and immune biomarkers
Airway inflammation and immune biomarkers (fractional exhaled nitric oxide \[FeNO\], peripheral blood eosinophil \[EOS\] count, and serum IgE levels)
Time frame: 12 months
Oral corticosteroid (OCS) sparing effect in asthma patients
Oral corticosteroid (OCS) sparing effect in asthma patients during treatment duration
Time frame: 12 months
Treatment persistence rate of the biologics
Treatment persistence rate of the biologics during treatment duration
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.