This randomized controlled trial evaluates two post systems used to restore endodontically treated (root canal treated) maxillary anterior teeth with 1-2 missing coronal walls. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a custom-adapted polyethylene fibers post (Ribbond-type, individually formed) or a prefabricated fiber post, followed by a composite core and crown restoration. The primary outcome is the distance between the post and the remaining root canal filling (gutta-percha), measured radiographically, which reflects how well the post adapts within the canal. The secondary outcome is post and restoration retention, assessed clinically using USPHS criteria. Participants will be followed for 6 months. The study aims to determine whether a custom-fitted fiber post provides better adaptation and retention compared to a standard prefabricated fiber post in teeth with significant structural loss.
Endodontically treated maxillary anterior teeth frequently present with significant loss of coronal tooth structure, compromising their resistance to fracture and complicating restoration. prefabricated fiber posts are widely used to retain a composite core prior to crown placement, but the degree to which a post adapts to the internal canal wall - leaving minimal or no gap between the post and the remaining gutta-percha - may influence long-term clinical performance and resistance to microleakage. This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing a custom-adapted ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers post (Ribbond-type), individually formed to the canal anatomy, against a prefabricated fiber post. Eligible teeth are endodontically treated maxillary anterior teeth with 1-2 missing coronal axial walls (mesial, distal, labial, and/or palatal), assessed at the cementoenamel junction, where any remaining sound walls meet a minimum height of 1.5-2 mm and a circumferential thickness of approximately 1 mm, in line with established ferrule criteria. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either the Ribbond post or the prefabricated fiber post, followed by a standardized composite core build-up and definitive crown restoration. Post space preparation, dentin conditioning, and cementation will follow a standardized step-by-step clinical protocol for each group. The primary outcome is the post-gutta-percha gap distance, measured radiographically and expressed continuously in millimeters, with cases additionally classified as showing no gap versus any measurable gap. This dichotomization and its expected baseline distribution are informed by prior clinical data reporting outcomes in maxillary anterior teeth. The secondary outcome is post and restoration retention, evaluated clinically at follow-up using USPHS criteria.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
84
Participants receive a custom-fit UHMWPE fiber post, individually adapted to the canal at chairside, followed by a composite core build-up and definitive crown restoration.
Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University
Cairo, Manial, Egypt
Post-Gutta-Percha Gap Distance
Distance between the outer surface of the cemented post and the residual root canal filling (gutta-percha), measured radiographically at the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the post space. Reported both as a continuous measurement (mm) and dichotomized as no gap versus any measurable gap.
Time frame: Immediately post-cementation (baseline)
Post and Restoration Retention
Clinical retention of the post-core-crown restoration, assessed using United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.
Time frame: 6 months post-cementation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.