Full-mouth dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (GA) is frequently required for young children with extensive dental caries, behavioral challenges, or special healthcare needs. Although various restorative materials and treatment approaches are used during comprehensive dental rehabilitation, evidence regarding their long-term clinical performance and failure rates remains limited. Objective: This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure rates of restorative materials and methods employed during full-mouth dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia in children over a two-year follow-up period. Methods: Children undergoing full-mouth dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia will be enrolled and followed prospectively for 24 months. Restorative procedures, including direct and indirect restorative treatments, pulp therapy-associated restorations, and full-coverage restorations, will be performed according to standardized clinical protocols. Clinical evaluations will be conducted at scheduled follow-up visits to assess restoration survival, integrity, recurrent caries, need for retreatment, and restoration failure. Failure rates and factors associated with restoration success or failure will be analyzed.
Early childhood caries and extensive dental disease remain significant oral health problems among children worldwide. In many cases, comprehensive dental treatment under general anesthesia (GA) is required to manage young children who exhibit extensive treatment needs, lack of cooperation, dental anxiety, behavioral limitations, or special healthcare needs. Full-mouth dental rehabilitation under GA enables the delivery of comprehensive restorative and preventive dental care in a single session, improving oral health and quality of life for affected children. A variety of restorative materials and treatment methods are routinely employed during pediatric dental rehabilitation under GA, including resin composite restorations, glass ionomer-based restorations, stainless steel crowns, esthetic full-coverage crowns, and restorations associated with pulp therapy procedures. Despite their widespread use, the long-term clinical performance and survival of these restorative approaches may vary according to material characteristics, tooth type, extent of carious destruction, patient-related factors, and oral hygiene practices. Restoration failure may result from recurrent caries, loss of restoration, marginal deterioration, fracture, wear, or the need for replacement or retreatment. Although several studies have evaluated restorative outcomes in pediatric patients, evidence comparing the long-term success and failure rates of restorative materials and techniques used during full-mouth dental rehabilitation under GA remains limited. Furthermore, most available studies have reported variable follow-up periods and heterogeneous outcome measures, making it difficult to establish evidence-based recommendations for restorative treatment selection. The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure rates of restorative materials and methods employed during children's full-mouth dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia over a two-year follow-up period. Children receiving comprehensive dental treatment under GA will be enrolled and monitored at predetermined follow-up intervals. Clinical assessments will evaluate restoration survival, retention, marginal integrity, recurrent caries, restoration fracture, need for repair or replacement, and overall treatment success. The cumulative survival and failure rates of different restorative materials and treatment methods will be determined, and factors associated with restoration longevity will be investigated.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
180
Restorative materials and treatment methods routinely employed during full-mouth dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia, including direct restorations and full-coverage restorations such as composite resin restorations, glass ionomer-based restorations, stainless steel crowns, and other clinically indicated restorative approaches. The selection of restorative material and treatment method will be determined by the treating clinician according to the child's clinical needs and standard clinical practice. The study investigators will not assign or randomize participants to any restorative material or treatment method. These restorative treatments will be observed prospectively to evaluate their clinical performance, survival, and failure rates over a 24-month follow-up period.
faculty of dentistry, Tanta university
Tanta, Egypt
RECRUITINGRestoration Failure Rate Over 24 Months
The proportion of restorations that experience failure during the 24-month follow-up period. Restoration failure will include recurrent caries, loss or debonding of the restoration, fracture, unacceptable marginal deterioration, or the need for restoration replacement, repair, or retreatment.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 months
Cumulative Restoration Failure Rate According to Restorative Material
Comparison of cumulative failure rates among the restorative materials routinely used during rehabilitation, such as composite resin, glass ionomer-based restorations, stainless steel crowns, and other clinically indicated restorative materials.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Types of Restoration Failure Assessed Using Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS/Ryge) Criteria
Frequency and distribution of restoration failure modes assessed according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS/Ryge) criteria. Failure modes include recurrent caries, loss of restoration retention, restoration fracture, marginal deterioration, excessive wear, and the need for repair, replacement, or retreatment. Restorations will be evaluated using USPHS ratings (Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, and Delta), where Alpha represents ideal clinical performance and Charlie/Delta ratings indicate clinically unacceptable conditions requiring intervention or replacement.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Restoration Failure According to Tooth Type and Location
Evaluation of restoration failure according to tooth type, primary anterior versus posterior teeth, maxillary versus mandibular arch, and other relevant tooth-related characteristics.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Overall Treatment Success Following Full-Mouth Dental Rehabilitation
Proportion of children completing the 24-month follow-up without major treatment failure requiring additional operative dental treatment under general anesthesia.
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.