This study is being done to see which of two common grafting techniques-mixing two different grafting materials or layering two grafting materials-works better to augment bone volume next to your dental implant(s). We want to know which technique results in better bone augmentation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
30
The exposed threads on the buccal side of the implant will be grafted with three distinct layers of grafting materials.
The exposed threads on the buccal side of the implant will be grafted with three grafting materials mixed together.
Periodontology Clinic, UCSF School of Dentistry
San Francisco, California, United States
Horizontal Bone Gain (mm) Measured by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)
Horizontal bone gain will be measured in millimeters (mm) by comparing CBCT images obtained at baseline and follow-up. Measurements will be performed using computer-based imaging software to quantify changes in horizontal alveolar ridge width at the treated site.
Time frame: 1 year after crown delivery
Implant Survival Assessed by Clinical Examination
Implant survival will be assessed by the treating provider through clinical examination at the specified follow-up time point. An implant will be considered surviving if it remains present and in function at the time of evaluation.
Time frame: 1 year after crown delivery
Pink Esthetic Score (PES) Assessed by a Blinded Examiner
Peri-implant esthetic outcomes will be evaluated by a blinded examiner using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES). The PES will be determined according to the predefined components of the scoring system, with higher scores indicating a more favorable peri-implant soft-tissue esthetic outcome.
Time frame: 1 year after crown delivery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.