This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical study for adults with type 2 diabetes and early diabetic kidney or retinal complications. A total of 1,200 eligible participants will be randomly divided into two groups at a 1:1 ratio. Participants in the intervention group will receive clinical management suggestions generated by the Chrocare large language model clinical decision support system, while those in the control group will receive standard diabetes care formulated by experienced endocrinologists. All participants will complete 3 study visits over 6 months to test blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, blood lipids, kidney and eye indicators, and record hypoglycemia or other adverse events. The main goal of this research is to compare whether the AI-assisted management can help more patients reach target blood glucose levels, as well as evaluate the safety of this AI system for long-term diabetes integrated treatment.
This trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial conducted in about 40 MMC (Metabolic Management Center) hospitals across China, enrolling 1200 adult patients aged ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus, baseline HbA1c 7.0%-9.0%, combined with mild-to-moderate diabetic nephropathy (UACR 3.39-33.9 mg/mmol) or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Subjects will be assigned 1:1 via central stratified randomization to the Chrocare AI clinical decision support system intervention group or routine physician care control group. The double-blind design separates physicians into two independent roles: one clinician interacts with patients and performs follow-up, another clinician generates treatment plans without direct patient contact, masking group allocation throughout the trial period. The Chrocare large language model automatically extracts multi-dimensional clinical data from hospital EHR, LIS and imaging systems, and generates individualized hypoglycemic, hypotensive and lipid-lowering regimens complying with domestic and international diabetes guidelines, alongside risk assessment of diabetic microvascular complications. The control group's treatment plans are developed by a panel of attending endocrinologists with more than 5 years of clinical experience through double independent review. All participants will undergo fixed visits at baseline, month 3 and month 6. Collected indicators include glycated hemoglobin, fasting and postprandial blood glucose, blood pressure, BMI, visceral fat, blood lipid profile, liver and renal function, urine albumin-creatinine ratio, and retinal grading. All hypoglycemia, cardiovascular events, hospitalizations and other adverse events will be fully documented for safety evaluation. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of participants achieving HbA1c less than 7.0% at month 6. Secondary endpoints include changes in metabolic indicators, improvement of microvascular complications, guideline adherence rate of treatment plans, and incidence of inappropriate medication. Safety endpoints cover all adverse events and serious adverse events during the 6-month follow-up. Statistical analyses will be performed on the full analysis set, per-protocol set and safety set using SAS, SPSS and R software, with mixed-effect logistic regression and generalized estimating equations applied for between-group comparisons. This study is initiated and sponsored by the Principal Investigator from Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and has obtained ethical approval from the institutional ethics committee prior to participant enrollment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
1,200
This artificial intelligence large language model system automatically extracts electronic medical, laboratory and imaging data of type 2 diabetes patients, generates individualized hypoglycemic, hypotensive and lipid-lowering treatment plans complying with domestic and international diabetes guidelines, and provides risk assessment of diabetic microvascular complications for integrated chronic disease management during 6-month standardized follow-up.
Individualized 2-type diabetes comprehensive management schemes formulated by attending endocrinologists through double independent review, with identical 6-month unified follow-up and test indicators as the AI intervention group.
Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, China
Proportion of participants achieving HbA1c less than 7.0% at Month 6
The percentage of subjects whose HbA1c level is below 7.0% after 6 months of intervention, compared between the Chrocare AI clinical decision support system group and the routine physician care control group. This indicator reflects the overall blood glucose control effect of integrated diabetes management.
Time frame: 6 months after participant enrollment
Change in HbA1c from baseline to Month 3 and Month 6
Absolute change of HbA1c value at Month 3 and Month 6 compared with baseline level, to evaluate the short-term and medium-term glucose-lowering effect of two management strategies.
Time frame: 3 months and 6 months after participant enrollment
Change in urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to Month 6
Variation of UACR after 6-month intervention, reflecting the improvement status of early diabetic nephropathy in participants.
Time frame: 6 months after participant enrollment
Change in diabetic retinopathy from baseline to Month 6
Variation of diabetic retinopathy after 6-month intervention, reflecting the improvement status of early diabetic retinopathy in participants.
Time frame: 6 months after participant enrollment
Proportion of treatment plans complying with domestic and international diabetes guidelines
The percentage of individualized hypoglycemic, hypotensive and lipid-lowering regimens consistent with clinical practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes, compared between two groups.
Time frame: Throughout the 6-month intervention period
Incidence of hypoglycemia and all adverse events during follow-up
Count and compare the occurrence rate of hypoglycemia, cardiovascular events and other adverse events in two groups within 6 months for safety evaluation.
Time frame: From baseline visit to Month 6 follow-up visit
Accuracy of preliminary diagnosis of diabetic microvascular complications (diabetic retinopathy, diabetic nephropathy) at baseline assessment
Compare the preliminary diagnostic accuracy rate of diabetic complications including retinopathy and nephropathy between the AI intervention group and routine physician control group when conducting baseline evaluation for enrolled participants.
Time frame: Baseline visit (at participant enrollment)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.