This study compared two membrane materials: 1. polycaprolactone (PCL) and 2. Extracellular matrix collagen membrane (ECM) as alternative. This is to see how well they prevent bone and gum damage after lower wisdom tooth removal. In this split-mouth trial, participants had both lower wisdom teeth removed, with one socket receiving PCL membrane and the other receiving ECM membrane after socket filled with EthOss (an alloplastic bone graft). Over a 24-week follow-up period, researchers tracked patient clinically on their comfort, gum healing, and new bone growth using X-rays.
Surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars (M3) often associated with post-operative morbidities such as pain, facial swelling, limited mouth opening and injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve or lingual nerve. In addition, it can result in compromised periodontal health of the adjacent second molar (M2) and reduced alveolar bone height at the M3 region. The defect can be restored using bone substitutes with membrane. This study aims to assess wound healing of the surgical sites of third molar surgery with application of alloplastic bone graft with PCL membrane and ECM-collagen membrane. This is a split-mouth, double blinded, randomized controlled study. Participants underwent surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars with either socket covered with PCL membrane and ECM-collagen membrane after filled up EthOss® alloplastic graft. The participants will be reviewed at post-operative 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3) and 6 months (T4) to monitor for signs of graft reaction/rejection. Periodontal assessments were performed at these four visits to assess the soft tissue healing. Radiological assessment (intraoral periapical x-ray) will be done at preoperative and post-operative week 24 to assess bone depth.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
18
This is a split-mouth, randomized, within-subject clinical trial using a crossover assignment model. Each participant serves as their own control, receiving both Intervention 1. PCL membrane and Intervention 2.ECM collagen membrane simultaneously on opposite sides of the lower third molar after socket filled up with alloplast.
This is a split-mouth, randomized, within-subject clinical trial using a crossover assignment model. Each participant serves as their own control, receiving both Intervention 1. PCL membrane and Intervention 2.ECM collagen membrane simultaneously on opposite sides of the lower third molar after socket filled up with alloplast.
Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Periodontal health assessment on lower second molar (1)
1\. Modified Plaque Score (from Score 0: No plaque present. Score 1: No visible plaque, but a periodontal probe skimmed across the tooth surface reveals soft plaque biofilm on the tip. Score 2: Visible plaque that can be easily seen with the naked eye without using a probe., modified bleeding score and gingival recession, periodontal pocketing depth)-- the lower the score, the better the periodontal health.
Time frame: baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
Periodontal health assessment on lower second molar (2)
Modified Bleeding Score (Score 0: No bleeding observed after probing. Score 1: Bleeding is present.)-- the lower the score, the better the periodontal health
Time frame: baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
Periodontal health assessment on lower second molar (3)
Periodontal Pocketing Depth (PPD) (measurement in milimeter, 1-3mm indicate healthy sulcus while \>5mm indicate periodontal disesase)-- the lower the score, the better the periodontal health.
Time frame: baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
Periodontal health assessment on lower second molar (4)
Gingival Recession- measurement in mm for gingival margin below the cementoenamel junction. - the lower the score, the better the periodontal health.
Time frame: baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
Periodontal health assessment on lower second molar (5)
The healing index of Landry (Grade 1 poor to Grade 5 excellent)
Time frame: baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
The width of keratinized tissue
The width of the keratinized gingiva will also be measured buccolingual at 6mm distal to the M2.
Time frame: baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
Bone gain at distal of lower second molar
The radiographic bone level will be measured at T0 and T4 as the distance between the distal point of a line passing through the cemento-enamel junction of M2 (mesial and distal projection of M2's CEJ) and the bone peak distal to M2, at the bottom of the bony defect Measurement in milimeter.
Time frame: radiograph taken prior to surgery and 24 weeks after surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.