The goal of this Phase 2 clinical trial is to learn if adding ruxolitinib to pembrolizumab may improve treatment outcomes in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who have increased levels of systemic inflammation before treatment, as measured by the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The investigational drug will be used outside of its approved indication (off-label use) based on its known pharmacologic mechanism and prior clinical experience in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and graft-versus-host disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is treatment with ruxolitinib in combination with pembrolizumab safe and well tolerated? Can the addition of ruxolitinib improve treatment outcomes compared with historical data? How does ruxolitinib affect the immune system and inflammation when given together with pembrolizumab? How does the combination treatment affect patients' quality of life? Participants will: Receive treatment with pembrolizumab and intermittent ruxolitinib. Undergo blood tests to assess immune responses and inflammation. Attend study visits for safety assessments and treatment monitoring. Complete quality-of-life questionnaires, where applicable. The results of this study will help researchers better understand how inflammation and the body's immune system affect treatment outcomes in people with head and neck cancer. The findings may also help improve the design of future studies investigating new treatment combinations for this disease.
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains associated with poor outcomes in a substantial proportion of patients despite the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors. An elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a marker of systemic inflammation, has been associated with reduced survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and may identify a subgroup of patients at increased risk of poor treatment outcomes. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition represents a potential strategy to modulate cancer-associated systemic inflammation and the tumor immune microenvironment. Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, has demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects and may enhance the activity of immune checkpoint inhibition by reducing inflammatory signaling pathways that could contribute to treatment resistance. This study uses a biomarker-driven treatment approach in patients with PD-L1-positive recurrent, metastatic, or locally advanced HNSCC who have evidence of increased systemic inflammation prior to treatment initiation. The study is designed to investigate the effects of combining pembrolizumab with intermittent ruxolitinib and to evaluate whether this approach can favorably influence systemic inflammation and immune responses while maintaining acceptable tolerability. Patients with advanced HNSCC are frequently frail and may be unable to tolerate the toxicities associated with conventional chemotherapy-based treatment approaches. Consequently, there is a need for treatment strategies that are both effective and well tolerated in patients with reduced performance status. The present study therefore focuses on a population with an inflammatory high-risk phenotype and seeks to generate clinical and translational evidence to support future treatment development. In addition to evaluating the clinical activity and tolerability of the combination regimen, the study will characterize treatment-associated changes in systemic inflammation and adaptive immune responses. The findings are intended to provide a better understanding of the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers, immune modulation, and clinical outcomes in HNSCC, and to inform the design of future randomized studies evaluating JAK inhibition in combination with immune checkpoint blockade.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
66
Ruxolitinib administered orally on an intermittent schedule in combination with pembrolizumab.
Pembrolizumab administered as standard-of-care immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Universitätslklinikum Würzburg
Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany
Uniklinik Köln
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Katholisches Krankenhaus Hagen
Hagen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg Hamburg
Hamburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
University Hospital Basel
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, Switzerland
Seeland Cancer Center Biel
Biel/Bienne, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
HOCH Health Ostschweiz
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, Switzerland
Universitätsspital Zürich
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale
Bellinzona, Canton Ticino, Switzerland
6-Month Progression-Free Survival Rate (R/M cohort only)
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from enrollment to the first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. The outcome measure is the proportion of participants who are alive and progression-free 6 months after enrollment.
Time frame: 6 months after enrollment
Change in systematic inflammation (Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, NLR)
Percentage of participants achieving normalisation of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) after completion of JAK-inhibition treatment. NLR is calculated as the absolute neutrophil count divided by the absolute lymphocyte count. Participants are considered to have achieved NLR normalisation if the post-treatment NLR meets the protocol-defined threshold for a normal NLR value.
Time frame: R/M cohort: at screening within 21 days before start of ruxolitinib or at week 6 (baseline) and at week 12. Neoadjuvant cohort: at screening within 21 days before start of ruxolitinib or at week 3 (baseline), at week 5 and at week 12.
Adherence to Planned JAK-Inhibition Treatment (R/M cohort only)
Proportion of participants who complete the planned JAK-inhibition treatment duration. Participants are considered adherent if they receive JAK-inhibition according to the protocol-defined treatment schedule and duration without premature discontinuation.
Time frame: From initiation of ruxolitinib treatment to Week 12 (up to 6 weeks of treatment).
Tumour response (R/M cohort only)
Best tumour response at week 12 by investigator assessment (objective response rate). Rationale: early signal of anti-tumour activity
Time frame: Week 12
Overall survival (R/M cohort only)
Overall survival is defined as the time from enrollment to death from any cause. Survival status will be assessed during follow-up and recorded every 6 months.
Time frame: From enrollment until death from any cause or until the end of study follow-up (up to approximately 5 years).
Quality of Life Assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 (R/M cohort only).
Change in quality of life measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale according to the EORTC scoring manual. Higher functional-scale scores indicate better functioning, whereas higher symptom-scale scores indicate greater symptom burden.
Time frame: At screening, week 12 and week 18
Quality of Life Assessed by EORTC QLQ-H&N43 (R/M cohort only)
Change in head and neck cancer-specific quality of life measured using the uropean Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Head and Neck Module (EORTC QLQ-H\&N43) questionnaire. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale according to the EORTC scoring manual. Higher symptom scores indicate greater symptom burden.
Time frame: At screening, week 12, week 18
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.