The primary objective of this study was to assess the proportion of participants in the infliximab plus naproxen arm versus the placebo plus naproxen arm, in a population of participants with moderate-to-severe active axial spondyloarthritis and disease duration of ≤3 years, who achieve the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) partial remission criteria.
In the 28-week treatment phase, participants were randomized to receive either infliximab plus naproxen or placebo plus naproxen. After 28-weeks of treatment, participants that achieved partial remission in the treatment phase were randomized to continued treatment with naproxen or to receive no treatment and were followed for an additional 24 weeks (follow-up phase).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
158
Number of Participants Achieving the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) Partial Remission Criteria at Week 28
ASAS domains were measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 to 100 mm (with 0 being the very best situation and 100 being the very worst situation). ASAS partial remission criteria is defined as reaching ≤20 mm in all 4 ASAS domains (i.e., patient global assessment, total back pain, function, and inflammation).
Time frame: Week 28
Number of Participants Maintaining the ASAS Partial Remission Criteria at Week 52 By Treatment Assignment in the Follow-Up Phase
ASAS domains were measured on a VAS of 0 to 100 mm (with 0 being the very best situation and 100 being the very worst situation). ASAS partial remission criteria is defined as reaching ≤20 mm in all 4 ASAS domains (i.e., patient global assessment, total back pain, function, and inflammation).
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Maintaining the ASAS Partial Remission Criteria at Week 52 By Treatment Assignment in the Treatment Phase
ASAS domains were measured on a VAS of 0 to 100 mm (with 0 being the very best situation and 100 being the very worst situation). ASAS partial remission criteria is defined as reaching ≤20 mm in all 4 ASAS domains (i.e., patient global assessment, total back pain, function, and inflammation).
Time frame: Week 52
Change From Baseline of Berlin Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Spine Overall Score at Week 28
MRI scans (T1 for chronic changes and short tau inversion recovery \[STIR\] for active changes) of the whole spine was performed to determine the Berlin MRI Spine Score. The Berlin MRI scoring for the spine was assessed on a scale of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) for a maximum total score of 69, with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change From Baseline in the Sacroiliac Overall Score at Week 28
Each sacroiliac joint was divided into four quadrants. An activity score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) was assessed for every quadrant of the left and right sacroiliac joint separately for a total maximum score of 24, with with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline of Berlin MRI Spine Overall Score at Week 52
MRI scans (T1 for chronic changes and STIR for active changes) of the whole spine was performed to determine the Berlin MRI Spine Score. The Berlin MRI scoring for the spine was assessed on a scale of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) for a maximum total score of 69, with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Sacroiliac Overall Score at Week 52
Each sacroiliac joint was divided into four quadrants. An activity score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) was assessed for every quadrant of the left and right sacroiliac joint separately for a total maximum score of 24, with with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Number of Participants With Complete Absence of Active Inflammatory Lesions at the Spine at Treatment Week 28
MRI scans (T1 for chronic changes and STIR for active changes) of the whole spine was performed to determine the Berlin MRI Spine Score. The Berlin MRI scoring for the spine was assessed on a scale of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) for a maximum total score of 69, with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable. Complete absence of active inflammatory lesions was defined as a Berlin MRI Score = 0.
Time frame: Week 28
Number of Participants With Complete Absence of Active Inflammatory Lesions at the Sacroiliac Joint at Treatment Week 28
Each sacroiliac joint was divided into four quadrants. An activity score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) was assessed for every quadrant of the left and right sacroiliac joint separately for a total maximum score of 24, with with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable. Complete absence of active inflammatory lesions at the sacroiliac joints was defined as a Score = 0.
Time frame: Week 28
Number of Participants With Complete Absence of Active Inflammatory Lesions at the Spine and Sacroiliac Joint at Treatment Week 28
MRI scans (T1 for chronic changes and STIR for active changes) of the whole spine was performed to determine the Berlin MRI Spine Score. The Berlin MRI scoring for the spine was assessed on a scale of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) for a maximum total score of 69, with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable. Complete absence of active inflammatory lesions was defined as a Berlin MRI Score = 0. Each sacroiliac joint was divided into four quadrants. An activity score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) was assessed for every quadrant of the left and right sacroiliac joint separately for a total maximum score of 24, with with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable. Complete absence of active sacroiliac inflammatory lesions was defined as a Score = 0.
Time frame: Week 28
Number of Participants With Complete Absence of Active Inflammatory Lesions at the Spine at Treatment Week 52
MRI scans (T1 for chronic changes and STIR for active changes) of the whole spine was performed to determine the Berlin MRI Spine Score. The Berlin MRI scoring for the spine was assessed on a scale of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) for a maximum total score of 69, with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable. Complete absence of active inflammatory lesions was defined as a Berlin MRI Score = 0.
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants With Complete Absence of Active Inflammatory Lesions at the Sacroiliac Joint at Treatment Week 52
EaEach sacroiliac joint was divided into four quadrants. An activity score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) was assessed for every quadrant of the left and right sacroiliac joint separately for a total maximum score of 24, with with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable. Complete absence of active sacroiliac inflammatory lesions was defined as a Score = 0.
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants With Complete Absence of Active Inflammatory Lesions at the Spine and Sacroiliac Joint at Treatment Week 52
MRI scans (T1 for chronic changes and STIR for active changes) of the whole spine was performed to determine the Berlin MRI Spine Score. The Berlin MRI scoring for the spine was assessed on a scale of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) for a maximum total score of 69, with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable. Complete absence of active spinal inflammatory lesions was defined as a Berlin MRI Score = 0. Each sacroiliac joint was divided into four quadrants. An activity score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) was assessed for every quadrant of the left and right sacroiliac joint separately for a total maximum score of 24, with with 0 = no inflammatory lesions; 1 = minor bone marrow edema; 2 = moderate bone marrow edema; 3 = major bone marrow edema; or N = non readable. Complete absence of active sacroiliac inflammatory lesions was defined as a Score = 0.
Time frame: Week 52
Median Duration of Maintaining ASAS Partial Remission in the Follow-Up Phase
ASAS domains were measured on a VAS of 0 to 100 mm (with 0 being the very best situation and 100 being the very worse situation). ASAS partial remission criteria is defined as reaching ≤20 mm in all 4 ASAS domains (i.e., patient global assessment, total back pain, function, and inflammation).
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved ASAS Partial Remission That Experienced Disease Flare With Naproxen Maintenance Treatment in the Follow-Up Phase
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) employs a VAS of 0mm (best) to 100mm (worst). Disease flare was defined as reaching a BASDAI of ≥30 mm during two consecutive visits after Week 28 until Week 52. ASAS domains were measured on a VAS of 0 to 100 mm (with 0 being the very best situation and 100 being the very worse situation). ASAS partial remission criteria was defined as reaching ≤20 mm in all 4 ASAS domains (i.e., patient global assessment, total back pain, function, and inflammation).
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants That Achieved ASAS-40 Response at Week 28 in the Treatment Phase
ASAS domains were measured on a VAS of 0 to 100 mm (with 0 being the very best situation and 100 being the very worse situation). ASAS-40 response was defined as ASAS achieving ≥40% improvement in 3 of the 4 domains (patient global assessment, total back pain, function, and inflammation), with an absolute improvement of ≥20 mm and no deterioration in the remaining domain.
Time frame: Week 28
Percentage of Participants That Achieved ASAS-20 Response at Week 28 in the Treatment Phase
ASAS-20 response was defined as ≥20% improvement in response according to following criteria: • An improvement of ≥20% from baseline and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥10 mm in at least 3 of the following 4 domains (patient global assessment, pain, function,and inflammation) • Absence of deterioration from baseline (≥20% and an absolute change of ≥10 mm) in the potential remaining domain.
Time frame: Week 28