The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple doses of tanezumab administered every 8 weeks in treating chronic low back pain. Tanezumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against human nerve growth factor.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
1,359
2 IV administrations of tanezumab 20 mg at an 8 week interval
Oral placebo for naproxen twice a day for 16 weeks
2 IV administrations of tanezumab 10 mg at an 8 week interval
Change From Baseline in Daily Average Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Daily average back pain was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) captured through an interactive voice response system (IVRS). The participant described the chronic low back pain (CLBP) during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 5 days prior to randomization (initial pain assessment period). Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 7-day period prior to and including the post-baseline visit. Overall possible score range for daily average LBPI at specified visit was 0= no pain to 10= worst possible pain, where higher scores indicated higher pain intensity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assesses how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement if it describes his/her functional ability on the day of assessment. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements marked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 (best functioning) to 24 (worst functioning), with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Participants answered: "Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range:1 to 5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Oral placebo for naproxen twice a day for 16 weeks
2 IV administrations of tanezumab 5 mg at an 8 week interval
Oral placebo for naproxen twice a day for 16 weeks
2 IV administrations of placebo for tanezumab at an 8 week interval
Oral naproxen 500 mg twice a day for 16 weeks
2 IV administrations of placebo for tanezumab at an 8 week interval
Oral placebo for naproxen twice a day for 16 weeks
Pinnacle Research Group, LLC
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Pinnacle Research Group LLC
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Pinnacle Research Group, LLC
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Simon Williamson Clinic, PC
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Simon-Williamson Clinic, PC
Hueytown, Alabama, United States
Saadat Ansari, MD office
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Horizon Research Group
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Radiant Research - Phoenix Southeast
Chandler, Arizona, United States
Pivotal Research Centers
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Arizona Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
...and 125 more locations
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Daily Average Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Daily average back pain was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) captured through an interactive voice response system (IVRS). The participant described the chronic low back pain (CLBP) during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 5 days prior to randomization (initial pain assessment period). Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 7-day period prior to and including the post-baseline visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 in Daily Average Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score : Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Daily average back pain was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) captured through an interactive voice response system (IVRS). The participant described the chronic low back pain (CLBP) during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 5 days prior to randomization (initial pain assessment period). Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 7-day period prior to and including the post-baseline visit. Participants with specified reduction (as percent) from baseline at Week 16 are reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent (%) and 50% Reduction From Baseline in Daily Average Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Daily average back pain was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) captured through an interactive voice response system (IVRS). The participant described the chronic low back pain (CLBP) during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 5 days prior to randomization (initial pain assessment period). Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 7-day period prior to and including the post-baseline visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-sf) Score for Worst and Average Pain at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
BPI-sf: self-report questionnaire rated on an 11-point scale, consists of 5 questions to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure severity of pain (worst, least, average, right now), each question ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life), each item ranging from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Results are reported for worst and average pain, each with a score range: 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine), higher scores indicated worse pain.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-sf) Score for Pain Interference Index, Pain Interference Score for General Activity, Walking Ability, Sleep and Normal Work at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: BOCF
BPI-sf: self-report questionnaire rated on an 11-point scale, consists of 5 questions to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure severity of pain (worst, least, average, right now), each question ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure pain interference (PI) on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life), each item ranging from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes); higher score = greater impairment. The 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain pain interference index (function composite score), range: 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference); higher score = greater impairment.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Responder Index: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Responder Index: A response was defined as reduction of at least 30% in mean daily average LBPI from baseline to a specified week, decrease of at least 30% in PGA of low back pain from baseline to the specified week and no worsening (increase) in RMDQ total score from baseline to the specified week. Participants who were responders were reported.
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 8 and 16
WPAI:SHP is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities. Four scores are derived as percent: activity impairment (AI), impairment while working (IW), overall work impairment (OWI), work time missed (WTM). Each of 4 scores expressed as impairment percentages with a total possible score range of 0 to 100, high percentage= more impairment, less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, 16
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medications
In case of inadequate pain relief for CLBP or for non-CLBP related pain, acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication.
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Duration of Rescue Medication Use
In case of inadequate pain relief for CLBP or for non-CLBP related pain, acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication.
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken
In case of inadequate pain relief for CLBP or for non-CLBP related pain, acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication.
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 8, 16 and 24
NIS is a standardized instrument used to evaluate signs of peripheral neuropathy in participants. NIS is the sum of scores of 37 items, from both the left and right side of following 4 domains: cranial nerves (5 items), muscle weakness (19 items), reflexes (5 items) and sensation (8 items). Each of 24 items related to cranial nerves and muscle weakness, scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis); higher scores indicated higher abnormality/impairment. Each of 13 items related to reflexes and sensation, scored as 0 (normal), 1 (decreased) and 2 (absent); higher scores indicated lesser reflexes and sensation. For NIS possible overall score (combined of both left and right sides of each domain), ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 244 (maximum impairment), higher scores indicated increased/more neuropathic deficits.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, 16, 24
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Same participant may have positive ADA result at more than 1 time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, 16, 24
Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab
Analysis was done by setting concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) to zero.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-dose and 1 hour [hr] post-dose); Any time point at Week 4 Visit; Week 8 (pre-dose and 1 hr post-dose); Any time point at Week 16 Visit, at Week 24 Visit
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Time frame: Baseline (pre-dose and 1 hour [hr] post-dose); Any time point at Week 4 Visit; Week 8 (pre-dose and 1 hr post-dose); Any time point at Week 16 Visit, at Week 24 Visit
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 24 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included SAEs as well as non-serious AEs which occurred during the trial.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24