The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of two vaginal applicators, delivering the candidate microbicide Tenofovir, on symptoms and signs of irritation of the external genitalia, cervix and vagina as seen on colposcopy after seven days of twice daily use. The secondary objectives are to: 1. Evaluate and compare the dosing accuracy and precision of the user-filled applicator and pre-filled applicator with the candidate microbicide, Tenofovir. 2. Compare the acceptability of the user-filled applicator with the pre-filled applicator.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
25
Delivered using prefilled and user-filled applicator
Clinica Profamilia
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
Number of Colposcopic Findings (Baseline and After One Week of Product Use)
Comparison of colposcopic findings between baseline visits and after one week of twice-daily application of Tenofovir 1% gel with either a user-filled or prefilled applicator
Time frame: 7 days
Filled Volume
At each dose delivery visit, the applicator was weighed, prior to vaginal insertion. For the user-filled applicator, the participant handed the applicator to the investigator after filling with gel from the multidose tube. The applicator was then weighed and returned to the participant for insertion. For the prefilled applicator, the participant inserted the plunger into the barrel, and then handed the applicator to the investigator for weighing.
Time frame: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Filling Precision (5% Range)
A 5% range was calculated around the average filled volumes to determine how many applicators were filled within this range (+/-5% of average volume)
Time frame: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Filling Precision (10% Range)
A 10% range was calculated around the average filled volumes to determine how many applicators were filled within this range (+/-10% of average volume)
Time frame: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Filling Accuracy (% of Target Dose)
The target dose for Tenofovir gel in this study was 4.0ml, which is the volume of Tenofovir being used in current microbicide clinical trials. The filled volume for each applicator was compared with the intended target dose of 4.0ml.
Time frame: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Dosing Volume (Expressed Volume)
At each dose delivery visit, the applicator was weighed prior to vaginal insertion and after use. The volume of gel expressed was measured using the following data: weight of filled applicator, weight of emptied applicator, the average weight of an empty applicator, and gel density.
Time frame: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Dosing Precision, 5% (Expressed Volume)
A 5% range was calculated around the average expressed volume of 3.83ml to determine how many applicators delivered a dose within this range (+/-5% of average volume)
Time frame: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Dosing Precision, 10% (Expressed Volume)
A 10% range was calculated around the average expressed volume of 3.83ml to determine how many applicators delivered a dose within this range (+/-10% of average volume)
Time frame: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Dosing Accuracy (% of Target Dose Delivered)
The target dose for Tenofovir gel in this study was 4.0ml, which is the volume of Tenofovir being used in current microbicide clinical trials. The average dose delivered for each applicator was compared with the intended target dose of 4.0ml.
Time frame: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Number of Participants Reporting Applicator Easy to Fill
Participants were asked to describe the process of filling the user-filled applicator. Response categories included "easy", "moderately difficult", and "difficult". Since "ease of filling" only applies to the user-filled applicator, this question was not applicable for the prefilled applicator.
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Respondents Reporting Confidence With Filling the User-filled Applicator
Participants were asked when using the user-filled applicator, how confident did they feel that they at inserted the correct amount of gel into the applicator. Response categories included "very confident", "confident", and "not confident". (Note: this question does not apply to the prefilled applicator.)
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Reasons Given by Participants for Knowing When the Applicator Was Filled Correctly
Participants were asked how did they know when the applicator was filled correctly (that is, with the right amount of gel). More than one answer was allowed. Response categories included "plunger automatically stopped", "the 'FULL' line was reached", and "other". Note: this question does not apply to the prefilled applicator.
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting Applicator Easy to Insert
Participants were asked to describe the insertion of the applicator into the vagina for each applicator (user-filled and prefilled). Response categories included "easy", "moderately difficult", and "difficult".
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That the Gel Was Easy to Dispense
Participants were asked to describe the dispensing of the gel into the vagina with each applicator (user-filled and prefilled). Response categories included "easy", "moderately difficult", and "difficult".
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting Applicator Preference (User-filled or Prefilled) Across a Variety of Factors
Participants were asked about their preference for either the user-filled or prefilled applicator with regard to several use factors as well as in relation to disposal, storage, and overall comfort and preference. Response categories included "user-filled", "prefilled", and "same".
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That Applicator Was Comfortable to Use
Participants were asked to describe the comfort of use for each applicator type(user-filled and prefilled). Response categories included "comfortable", "neutral", and "uncomfortable".
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting Suggestions Regarding Ease of Use or Comfort
Participants were asked if they could suggest ways that would make each applicator easier or more comfortable to use. Response categories were "yes" and "no". If yes, participants were asked to describe how they would make the applicator easier and/or more comfortable to use.
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That the Instructions for Use Were Helpful
For each applicator type, participants were asked if the instructions were helpful to you. Response categories were "yes" and "no".
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That Both Applicators Were Acceptable
Participants were asked if both applicators were acceptable to them. Responses were either "yes" or "no".
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That the Cost of the Applicator Would Influence Their Choice of Applicator
Participants were asked if the cost of the applicator would influence their choice of applicator. Response categories were "yes", "no", and "maybe".
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That They Would Use the User-filled Applicator in the Future if it Came With a Gel for HIV Prevention
Participants were asked if they would use the user-filled applicator in the future if it came with a gel that helped prevent HIV infection. Response categories included "yes", "no", and "in some circumstances".
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That They Would Not Want to Use the User-filled Applicator in the Future if it Came With a Gel for HIV Prevention
Participants were asked if there were any reasons that they would not want to use this user-filled applicator in the future if it came with a gel that helped prevent HIV infection. Response categories included "yes", "no", and "in some circumstances".
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That They Would Recommend the User-filled Applicator for HIV Prevention
Participants were asked if they would recommend the user-filled applicator to other women if it came with a gel that helped prevent HIV infection. Response categories included "yes", "no", and "in some circumstances".
Time frame: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)