The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial is to determine if the combination of eflornithine plus sulindac is superior to sulindac or eflornithine as single agents in delaying time to the first occurrence of any FAP-related event. This includes: 1) FAP related disease progression indicating the need for excisional intervention involving the colon, rectum, pouch, duodenum and/or 2) clinically important events which includes progression to more advanced duodenal polyposis, cancer or death.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
171
Eflornithine \[250 mg tablet, three tablets (750 mg) orally once a day\]
Eflornithine placebo \[three tablets orally once a day\]
Sulindac \[one tablet orally once a day\]
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, California, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Number of Subjects With Any FAP-related Event.
Progression of disease by evaluation of FAP-related events over the course of study treatment
Time frame: Up to 48 months from the start of treatment
Improvement in Investigator Upper GI Assessment
Global assessment of change in upper GI polyp burden. These are binary outcomes derived from scores assigned by the investigator during each procedure, using a scale (-2, -1, 0, +1, +2) which corresponds, respectively, to the investigator's overall qualitative assessment of: much worse, worse, no change, improved, much improved. Summarizes the corresponding 6- and 12-month investigator change scores according to whether or not there was any positive improvement at either month 6 (compared to baseline) or at month 12 (compared to baseline or month 6), under the condition that there be no worsening at either timepoint.
Time frame: through month 12 assessment
Improvement in Investigator Lower GI Assessment
Global assessment of change in lower GI polyp burden. These are binary outcomes derived from scores assigned by the investigator during each procedure, using a scale (-2, -1, 0, +1, +2) which corresponds, respectively, to the investigator's overall qualitative assessment of: much worse, worse, no change, improved, much improved. Summarizes the corresponding 6- and 12-month investigator change scores according to whether or not there was any positive improvement at either month 6 (compared to baseline) or at month 12 (compared to baseline or month 6), under the condition that there be no worsening at either timepoint.
Time frame: through month 12 assessment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Sulindac placebo \[one tablet orally once a day\]
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
...and 7 more locations