The primary objectives are: Phase 1b: * To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of oprozomib given orally, once daily, on 2 different schedules. * To evaluate safety and tolerability Phase 2: * To estimate the overall response rate (ORR). * To evaluate safety and tolerability
The purpose of the Phase 1b portion of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oprozomib administered orally once daily in combination with dexamethasone, in participants with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme with and without step-up dosing. The MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which fewer than 33% of participants had a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
65
Oprozomib tablets were supplied containing 60, 90, or 120 mg of oprozomib. Oprozomib extended release tablets were supplied containing 150, 180, 210, 240, or 270 mg of oprozomib. Both formulations were administered in a single dose on dosing days. The tablet formulation required multiple tablets to reach each dose on dosing days.
Dexamethasone was administered as 20 mg tablets in strengths of 4 and 6 mg taken orally. If a participant could not tolerate tablets or tablets were unavailable, 20 mg administered intravenously was substituted.
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, United States
University of Kansas Cancer Center and Medical Pavilion
Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
Toxicities (graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.03) were considered DLTs if judged by the investigator to be related to oprozomib and occurred in the first 14 days of treatment, with treatment at the dose to be studied (i.e., Cycle 1 for continuous dosing or Cycle 2 for step-up dosing). A DLT was categorized as nonhematologic or hematologic. Examples include: * Any ≥ Grade 3 nonhematologic AE, with exceptions or qualifications such as Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or constipation were considered a DLT only if lasting for \> 7 days despite optimal supportive care * Grade 3 fatigue lasting \> 14 days * Grade 4 neutropenia: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 500 cells/mcL lasting ≥ 7 days * Febrile neutropenia: Any single temperature ≥ 38.3°C or a sustained temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for over 1 hour with ≥ Grade 3 neutropenia (ANC \< 1000 cells/mcL) * Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia * Others specified in the protocol
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 14 (Cycle 1) for continous dosing and Day 15 to Day 28 (Cycle 2) for step-up dosing
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Phase 1b and 2
AE defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant. Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as adverse events that start on or after the first day of study treatment and within 30 days of the last day of study treatment. An adverse event that was present before the first administration of study treatment and subsequently worsens in severity during treatment was also considered to be treatment-emergent. Serious AE defined as AE that is fatal, life threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or other significant medical hazard. Severity of AEs assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v4.03) based on the general guideline: Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4: Life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: Death related to AE. IP=investigational product
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 282
Participants With Treatment-Related, Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Phase 1b and 2
AE defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant. TEAEs were defined as AEs that start on or after the first day of study treatment and within 30 days of the last day of study treatment. An AE that was present before the first administration of study treatment and subsequently worsens in severity during treatment was also considered a TEAE. Investigator assessed AEs for relatedness to study drug. Serious AE defined as AE that is fatal, life threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or other significant medical hazard. Severity of AEs assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v4.03) based on the general guideline: Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4: Life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: Death related to AE. IP=investigational product
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Westwood, Kansas, United States
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Division of Hematology/ Oncology, UNC at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Gabrail Cancer Center Research
Canton, Ohio, United States
Froedtert Hospital and the Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
...and 3 more locations
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 282
Best Overall Response in Phase 2 as Assessed by Investigator
Disease response and progression were determined using the International Myeloma Working Group-Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC), except for minimal response (MR) and near complete response (nCR) which was based on the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. Evaluations reported were assessed by the investigator for participants in Phase 2.
Time frame: Screening: Day 14 to Day -1; During study: Day 1 up to 13.16 months
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response As Assessed by Investigator During Phase 2
The overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants with the best overall response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), near complete response (nCR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR) as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group-Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC) and modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria.
Time frame: Screening: Day 14 to Day -1; During study: Day 1 up to 13.16 months
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Oprozomib, Tablet and ER Formulation: Time to Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) on Cycle 1, Day 1
PK samples obtained on the following schedule: Phase 1b Continuous Dosing, Cycles 1 and 2: Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 1b Step-up Dosing, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 2, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2
Time frame: Day 1
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Oprozomib, Tablet and ER Formulation: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) on Cycle 1, Day 1
PK samples obtained on the following schedule: Phase 1b Continuous Dosing, Cycles 1 and 2: Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 1b Step-up Dosing, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 2, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2
Time frame: Day 1
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Oprozomib, Tablet and ER Formulation: Area Under the Curve at the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) on Cycle 1, Day 1
The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) was estimated using the linear trapezoidal method. PK samples obtained on the following schedule: Phase 1b Continuous Dosing, Cycles 1 and 2: Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 1b Step-up Dosing, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 2, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2
Time frame: Day 1
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Oprozomib, Tablet and ER Formulation: Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to Time Infinity (AUCinf) on Cycle 1, Day 1
The area under the plasma concentration-curve from time 0 to time infinity (AUCinf) was estimated using the linear trapezoidal method PK samples obtained on the following schedule: Phase 1b Continuous Dosing, Cycles 1 and 2: Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 1b Step-up Dosing, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 2, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2
Time frame: Day 1
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Oprozomib, Tablet and ER Formulation: Terminal Half-Life (t1/2,z) on Cycle 1, Day 1
PK samples obtained on the following schedule: Phase 1b Continuous Dosing, Cycles 1 and 2: Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 1b Step-up Dosing, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 2, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2
Time frame: Day 1
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Oprozomib, Tablet and ER Formulation: Apparent Drug Clearance After Oral Administration (CL/F) on Cycle 1, Day 1
The apparent drug clearance after oral administration (CL/F) was calculated as the dose divided by AUCinf. PK samples obtained on the following schedule: Phase 1b Continuous Dosing, Cycles 1 and 2: Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 1b Step-up Dosing, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 2, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2
Time frame: Day 1
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Oprozomib, Tablet and ER Formulation: Apparent Volume of Distribution After Oral Administration (Vz/F) on Cycle 1, Day 1
The apparent volume of distribution after oral administration (Vz/F) calculated as the dose divided by AUCinf times ƒz, where ƒz was the first-order terminal rate constant estimated via linear regression of the terminal log-linear phase. PK samples obtained on the following schedule: Phase 1b Continuous Dosing, Cycles 1 and 2: Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 1b Step-up Dosing, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2 Phase 2, Day 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 hours post-dose plus pre-dose on Day 2
Time frame: Day 1
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Benefit Response As Assessed by Investigator During Phase 2
The clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as Overall Response Rate (ORR) plus Minimal Response (MR) as defined by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria.
Time frame: Screening: Day 14 to Day -1; During study: Day 1 up to 13.16 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator During Phase 2
Duration of response was defined as the time from first evidence of partial response (PR) or better (i.e. best overall response) to confirmation of disease progression or death due to any cause. Durations were calculated for responders only. Medians and percentiles were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% confidence intervals for medians and percentiles were estimated using the method by Klein and Moeschberger (1997) with log-log transformation.
Time frame: Day 1 up to 13.16 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigator During Phase 2
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as number of months between start of treatment and first evidence of documented disease progression or death (due to any cause), whichever occurs first. Disease progression was determined using IMWG-URC per investigator. The duration of PFS was right-censored for participants who met 1 of the following conditions: * 1\) starting a new anticancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death; * 2\) death or disease progression immediately after more than 1 consecutively missed disease assessment visit or; * 3\) alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cutoff date. 95% CIs for medians were estimated using the method by Klein and Moeschberger (1997) with log-log transformation.
Time frame: Day 1 up to 14.1 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Time to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by Investigator During Phase 2
Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the number of months between the start of treatment to the first documentation of disease progression. Disease progression was determined using IMWG-URC as assessed by the investigator. The same censoring rules, except for death, as in analysis of PFS were applied in the calculation of TTP. Participants who died prior to progressive disease were censored at the date of last evaluable response assessment.
Time frame: Day 1 up to 14.1 months