TB PRACTECAL is a multi-centre, open label, multi-arm, randomised, controlled, phase II-III trial; evaluating short treatment regimens containing bedaquiline and pretomanid in combination with existing and re-purposed anti-TB drugs for the treatment of biologically confirmed pulmonary multi drug-resistant TB (MDR-TB).
This is a multi-centre, open label, multi-arm, randomised, controlled, phase II-III trial; evaluating short treatment regimens containing bedaquiline and pretomanid in combination with existing and re-purposed anti-TB drugs for the treatment of biologically confirmed pulmonary multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). The study will be divided into two stages, with a seamless transition between the stages, meaning recruitment into an arm will only stop after a decision has been taken following stage 1 primary end point data analysis. All recruited patients will be followed up to 108 weeks post randomisation unless they die or withdraw consent. The local standard of care (SOC) MDR-TB regimen will be used as the internal control for both safety and efficacy. The first stage corresponds to a Phase II trial of safety and preliminary efficacy in patients with MDR-TB. Patients will be recruited into 3 parallel B and Pa containing regimen arms plus a SOC control. The main objective of Stage 1 is to select drug regimens for evaluation in Stage 2 based on 8 week safety and efficacy endpoints. All stage 1 patients will be hospitalised for 8 weeks for intensive cardiological evaluations to establish the QT-specific liability of the regimens. Investigational arms that do not meet predefined safety and efficacy criteria (percentage culture conversion \>40%; percentage discontinuation and death \<45%) will not be considered for further evaluation. The regimens that do not meet these pre-defined safety and/or efficacy criteria will be eligible to be evaluated for long term safety, tolerability and efficacy in Stage 2. If less than two investigational arms are available for stage two assessment, the SAC will make recommendations on whether new arms should be introduced in the study. If more than two arms are available for the Stage 2 assessment, two regimens will be chosen. The SAC will make recommendations on which arms to take forward to the trial steering committee. The second stage corresponds to a phase III trial. Patients in this stage will be recruited into the arms chosen from stage 1 plus the SOC. The regimens will primarily be evaluated for safety and efficacy in comparison with the SOC arm at 72 weeks post randomisation. The primary efficacy outcome will be a composite endpoint of the percentage of unfavourable outcomes. The secondary outcomes will include safety outcomes and in particular the percentage of Grade 3 or 4 AEs and SAEs in the investigational regimens compared with the SOC.
Republican Scientific and Practical Centre for Pulmonology and Tuberculosis hospital
Minsk, Belarus
Helen Jospeh Hospital
Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
THINK Clinical Trial Unit, Hillcrest
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
King DinuZulu Hospital
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Stage 1:Percentage of patients with culture conversion in liquid media at 8 weeks post randomisation.
Time frame: 8 weeks post randomisation
Stage 1: Percentage of patients who discontinue treatment for any reason or die
Time frame: 8 weeks post randomisation
Stage 2: Percentage of patients with an unfavourable outcome (failure, death, recurrence, loss to follow-up)
Time frame: 72 weeks post-randomisation
Stage 1: Percentage of patients with grade 3 or higher QT prolongation
Time frame: within 8 weeks post randomisation
Stage 1: Percentage of patients experiencing at least one Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time frame: within 8 weeks post randomisation
Stage 1:Percentage of patients experiencing at least one new grade 3 or higher Adverse Event
Time frame: within 8 weeks post randomisation
Stage 2: Percentage of patients with culture conversion
Time frame: 12 weeks post randomisation
Stage 2: Percentage of patients with an unfavourable outcome (i.e. failure, treatment discontinuation, death, loss to follow up)
Time frame: 24 weeks post randomisation
Stage 2: Percentage of patients with an unfavourable outcome (i.e. failure, treatment discontinuation, death, loss to follow up, still on treatment at censure and recurrence)
Time frame: 108 weeks post randomisation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
552
Doris Goodwin Hospital
Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Republican TB Hospital No. 2
Nukus, Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan
Sh Alimov Republican Specialised Scientific-Practical Medical Centre for Phthysiology and Pulmonology Hospital
Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Stage 2: Median time to culture conversion
Time frame: 108 weeks
Stage 2: Percentage of patients with an SAE or new grade 3 or higher AE
Time frame: 72 weeks post randomisation
Stage 2: Percentage of patients with an SAE or new grade 3 or higher AE
Time frame: 108 weeks post randomisation
Stage 2: Percentage of patients with an SAE or new grade 3 or higher AE at the end of treatment
The percentage of patients with an SAE or new grade 3 or higher AE at the end of treatment in the investigational arms (maximum of 24 weeks) and the SOC arm which varies in length (maximum 108 weeks).
Time frame: 24 weeks in investigational arms and 108 weeks in SOC arm
Stage 2: Mean single ΔQTcF
Time frame: 24 weeks post randomisation
Stage 2: Percentage of patients experiencing recurrence
Time frame: week 48 in investigational arms
Stage 2: Plasma drug concentrations
Time frame: In relation to dose intake and start of treatment over a 72 week period
Stage 2: TB drug hair levels
Time frame: In relation to dose intake and start of treatment over a 72 week period