Sepsis continues to be a major global cause of both mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in sepsis increases the risk of unfavorable outcomes. Besides source control, fluid resuscitation and the use of antibiotics, application of extracorporeal renal replacement therapies (RRT) is the predominant treatment for sepsis-associated AKI (SAKI). However, the timing of initiation of RRT remains controversial. It is reported that a correlation was observed between the concentrations of circulating inflammatory cytokines and mortality in patients with septic shock. Therefore, it is hypothesis that adequate removal of inflammatory mediators from the circulation may provide a potential therapy for this devastating condition. Indeed, data from meta-analyses, observational studies and randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggests that initiating RRT in critical ill patients (including patients with sepsis and non-sepsis) at early stage may be beneficial. But in some studies, initiating RRT at early stage do not shown to improve survival compared with initiating RRT at late stage. At present, large-scale prospective RCT about the timing for initiating RRT in SAKI was still lack.The decision when to start RRT is not merely academic but may impact on outcomes. Therefore, in our study, 460 patients with SAKI at KDIGO 2 from multicenter in China will be recruited. And then the patients will be divided into early group and delayed group randomly. In the early group, continuous RRT (CRRT) was started immediately after randomization. In the delay group, CRRT was initiated if at least one of the following criteria was met: KDIGO 3, severe hyperkalemia, pulmonary edema, blood urea nitrogen level higher than 112 mg per deciliter after randomization. Overall survival at day 90 will be observed in order to understand whether different CRRT strategy would affect the outcomes of SAKI. This clinical study will be a large-scale, multi center, prospective, randomized trial about SAKI. It will help clinician choose appropriate timing to initiate CRRT and improve outcomes of SAKI.
In our study, 460 patients with SAKI at KDIGO 2 from multicenter in China will be recruited. And then the patients will be divided into early group and delayed group randomly. In the early group, CRRT was started immediately after randomization. In the delay group, CRRT was initiated if at least one of the following criteria was met: KDIGO 3, severe hyperkalemia, pulmonary edema, blood urea nitrogen level higher than 112 mg per deciliter after randomization. Overall survival at day 90 will be observed in order to understand whether different CRRT strategy would affect the outcomes of SAKI.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
460
The choice of the method of continuous renal replacement therapy (device setting and anticoagulation method) is left to the discretion of each study site and was prescribed and monitored according to national guidelines.
the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
RECRUITINGthe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
RECRUITINGoverall mortality
overall survival measured from randomization to death or day 90
Time frame: 90 days
recovery rate of renal function
the recovery rate of renal function will be compared between groups
Time frame: 90 days
organ dysfunction
the frequency of occurrence at least one organ dysfunction besides the kidney
Time frame: 90 days
length of ICU stay and in-hospital stay
average length of ICU stay and in-hospital stay will be compared
Time frame: 90 days
the percentage of receipt of CRRT at least once in the delayed group
the percentage of receipt of CRRT at least once in the delayed group
Time frame: 90 days
the number of days alive without CRRT, mechanical ventilation and vasopressor
the numbers of CRRT-free days, mechanical ventilation-free days and vasopressor-free days, between D0 and up to D90
Time frame: 90 days
difference of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score
difference of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (0\~24) at day 0, 1, 3, 7, 14 and day 28 between groups. Higher score means more illness.
Time frame: 28 days
the rate of complications potentially related to CRRT
the rate of complications potentially related to CRRT
Time frame: 90 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.