This is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab given in combination with cabozantinib versus cabozantinib alone in participants with inoperable, locally advanced, or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who experienced radiographic tumor progression during or after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) treatment in the metastatic setting.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
522
Atezolizumab 1200 mg will be administered at a fixed dose on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle by IV infusion every 3 weeks.
Cabozantinib 60 mg (three 20-mg tablets) administered orally once daily.
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, United States
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Duarte, California, United States
UC San Diego Health System
La Jolla, California, United States
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an Independent Review Facility (IRF) (IRF-PFS) According to RECIST v1.1
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence to PD, as determined by the IRF per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 millimeters (mm). Data for participants who did not experience PD or death was censored at the last tumor assessment date. Data for participants with no post-baseline tumor assessments was censored at the randomization date. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) method.
Time frame: From randomization to the first occurrence of PD according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 2 years 5 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Data for participants who were not reported as having died at the date of analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Participants without post-baseline information were censored at the date of randomization. OS was estimated using KM method.
Time frame: From randomization to death due to any cause (up to 2 years 5 months).
PFS Assessed by the Investigators (INV-PFS), According to RECIST v1.1
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm. Data for participants who did not experience PD or death was censored at the last tumor assessment date. Data for participants with no post-baseline tumor assessments were censored at the randomization date. PFS was estimated using KM method.
Time frame: From randomization to the first occurrence of PD according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 2 years 5 months)
Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR) (INV-ORR), According to RECIST v1.1
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective response i.e. a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at two consecutive tumor assessments at least 28 days apart, as determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR.
Time frame: Up to 2 years 5 months
IRF-assessed ORR (IRF-ORR) According to RECIST v1.1
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective response i.e. a CR or PR at two consecutive tumor assessments at least 28 days apart, as determined by the IRF per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR.
Time frame: Up to 2 years 5 months
Investigator-assessed Duration of Response (DOR) (INV-DOR), According to RECIST v1.1
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of an objective response (CR or PR) to PD or death, whichever occurred first, as determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm. DOR was estimated using KM method.
Time frame: From the date of first occurrence of a documented objective response to PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 2 years 5 months)
IRF-assessed DOR (IRF-DOR) According to RECIST v1.1
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of an objective response (CR or PR) to PD or death, whichever occurred first, as determined by IRF per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm. DOR was estimated using KM method.
Time frame: From the date of first occurrence of a documented objective response to PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 2 years 5 months)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Time frame: Up to approximately 50 months
Serum Concentration of Atezolizumab
Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 and 16; 30 minutes postdose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (1 cycle = 21 days); Treatment discontinuation visit (up to approximately 46 months)
Plasma Concentration of Cabozantinib
Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, and 4 (1 cycle = 21 days); Treatment discontinuation visit (up to approximately 48 months)
Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab
Participants who received atezolizumab were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following atezolizumab exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response).
Time frame: Up to approximately 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Rocky Mountain Cancer Center - Denver
Littleton, Colorado, United States
Woodlands Medical Specialists, P.A.
Pensacola, Florida, United States
Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, United States
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
...and 125 more locations