This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of using combination of 755-nm picosecond alexandrite laser and 2% hydroquinone compared with 2% hydroquinone alone for the treatment of melasma: A randomized split-face controlled trial
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
20
treatment one side of the face with 755-nm picosecond alexandrite laser with topical 2% hydroquinone
treatment one side of the face with topical 2% hydroquinone
Department of Dermatology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok, Thailand
RECRUITINGModified melasma area and severity index score(mMASI) - comparing between Picosecond laser 755 nm with 2%HQ and 2%HQ alone for treatment of melasma of using combination of 755-nm picosecond alexandrite laser and 2% hydroquinone
score range 0-24
Time frame: 6 months
Melanin index measured by Mexameter® - comparing between Picosecond laser 755 nm with 2%HQ and 2%HQ alone for treatment of melasma
measuring in au
Time frame: 6 months
Average melanin measured by Antera3D® - comparing between Picosecond laser 755 nm with 2%HQ and 2%HQ alone for treatment of melasma
measuring in au
Time frame: 6 months
Patient satisfaction quartile score - comparing between Picosecond laser 755 nm with 2%HQ and 2%HQ alone for treatment of melasma
score 0 -100%
Time frame: 6 months
Physician evaluation quartile score - comparing between Picosecond laser 755 nm with 2%HQ and 2%HQ alone for treatment of melasma
score 0 -100%
Time frame: 6 months
Safety of using combination of 755-nm picosecond alexandrite laser
Monitor side effect from picesecond alexandrite laser
Time frame: 6 months
Safety of using 2% hydroquinone
side effect of topical 2%Hydroquinone use
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.