The goals of this clinical study are to learn about the safety, tolerability, dosing and effectiveness of magrolimab in combination with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel (cohort 1) or with sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (cohort 2) in participants with non-surgically removable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. The primary objective of this study for the safety run-in cohorts of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of magrolimab in combination with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel (Safety Run-In Cohort 1), and sacituzumab govitecan (Safety Run-In Cohort 2) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). This study in the Phase 2 Cohort 1 also compares the efficacy of magrolimab in combination with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel versus nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel alone, as determined by progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator assessment. This study in the Phase 2 Cohort 2 also evaluates the efficacy of magrolimab in combination with sacituzumab govitecan as determined by confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by investigator assessment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
92
Administered intravenously
Administered intravenously
Administered intravenously
Administered intravenously
Mayo Clinic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Women's Cancer Care
Fresno, California, United States
Providence Medical Foundation
Fullerton, California, United States
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Saint John's Cancer Institute
Santa Monica, California, United States
Safety Run-in Cohorts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
A DLT is defined as any: * Grade 3 or higher hematologic toxicity including: * Hemolytic anemia that is medically significant, requiring hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, disabling, or limiting self-care activities of daily life. * Event meeting Hy's Law criteria: * Treatment-emergent alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (at least 3 x ULN), AND * Treatment-emergent total bilirubin elevation (more than 2 x ULN), and absence of cholestasis (defined as alkaline phosphatase less than 2 x ULN), AND * No other good explanation for the injury (hepatitis A, B, C, or other viral hepatic injury, alcohol ingestion, congestive heart failure, worsening liver metastases). * Grade 3 or higher nonhematologic toxicity that has worsened in severity from pretreatment baseline during the DLT assessment period, and in the opinion of the investigator, the AE is at least possibly related to magrolimab.
Time frame: First dose date up to 28 days (Cohort 1) and up to 21 days (Cohort 2)
Safety Run-in Cohorts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAEs are defined as any events not present prior to the study treatment, or any events already present but worsening in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the study treatment. TEAEs were any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of the last dose of study treatment, or the day before initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy, whichever comes first. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study patient administered a study drug that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Time frame: First dose date up to last dose date (up to 73 weeks) plus 30 days
Safety Run-in Cohorts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-emergent Laboratory Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE), Version 5.0
Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities according to NCI CTCAE V5.0 are defined as values that increase at least 1 toxicity grade from baseline at any postbaseline time point, up to and including the date of last dose of study drug plus 30 days and prior to the day before initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Grade 1 mild, Grade 2 moderate, Grade 3 severe, Grade 4 life-threatening and Grade 5 death. Percentages were rounded off.
Time frame: First dose date up to last dose date (up to 73 weeks) plus 30 days
Phase 2 Cohort 1: Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Determined by Investigator Assessment Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the earliest date of documented disease progression (PD), as determined by investigator assessment per RECIST version 1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates were used in outcome measure analysis.
Time frame: Up to 107 weeks
Safety Run-in Cohort 2 and Phase 2 Cohort 2: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by Investigator Assessment Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response by investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Clopper-Pearson estimates were used in outcome measure analysis. Percentages were rounded off.
Time frame: Up to 107 weeks
Phase 2 Cohort 1: Confirmed ORR as Determined by Investigator Assessment Per RECIST, Version 1.1
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a CR or PR that is confirmed at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response, as measured by RECIST version 1.1, as determined by investigator assessment. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Clopper-Pearson estimates were used in outcome measure analysis. Percentages were rounded off.
Time frame: Up to 107 weeks
Safety Run-in Cohort 2 and Phase 2 Cohort 2: PFS as Determined by Investigator Assessment Using RECIST Version 1.1
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the earliest date of documented disease progression, as determined by investigator assessment per RECIST version 1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: Up to 107 weeks
Phase 2 Cohort 1, Safety Run-in Cohort 2 and Phase 2 Cohort 2: Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by Investigator Assessment Per RECIST Version 1.1
DOR is defined as time from first documentation of CR or PR to the earliest date of documented PD, as determined by investigator assessment per RECIST version 1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: Up to 107 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Providence Medical Foundation
Santa Rosa, California, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
University Cancer & Blood Center,LLC
Athens, Georgia, United States
Winship Cancer Institute Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Southeastern Regional Medical Center, LLC
Newnan, Georgia, United States
...and 35 more locations
Phase 2 Cohort 1, Safety Run-in Cohort 2 and Phase 2 Cohort 2: Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as time from date of randomization to death from any cause.
Time frame: Up to 107 weeks
Phase 2 Cohort 1 and Cohort 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing TEAEs
TEAEs are defined as any events not present prior to the study treatment, or any events already present but worsening in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the study treatment. TEAEs were any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of the last dose of study treatment, or the day before initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy, whichever comes first. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study patient administered a study drug that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Percentages were rounded-off.
Time frame: First dose date up to last dose date (up to 73 weeks) plus 30 days
Phase 2 Cohort 1 and Cohort 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Abnormalities According to NCI CTCAE, Version 5.0
Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities according to NCI CTCAE V5.0 are defined as values that increase at least 1 toxicity grade from baseline at any postbaseline time point, up to and including the date of last dose of study drug plus 30 days and prior to the day before initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Percentages were rounded off.
Time frame: First dose date up to last dose date (up to 73 weeks) plus 30 days
Cohort 1 (Safety Run-in and Phase 2) and Cohort 2 (Safety Run-in and Phase 2): Concentration Levels of Magrolimab Over Time
Time frame: Cohort 1: Predose - Day 1, 8, 22, 43, 85, 127, 190 and 253, Postdose 1 hour - Day 8 and 43; Cohort 2: Predose - Day 1, 8, 22, 43, 64, 85, 127, 190 and 253, Postdose 1 hour - Day 43 and 64
Percentage of Participants With Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) to Magrolimab
Time frame: Up to 73 weeks