This phase II trials studies the effect of treosulfan-based versus clofarabine-based conditioning regimens before donor hematopoietic stem cell transplant in treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia. Chemotherapy drugs, such as treosulfan, fludarabine, and clofarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving chemotherapy and total-body irradiation before a donor hematopoietic stem cell transplant helps kill cancer cells in the body and helps make room in the patient's bone marrow for new blood-forming cells (stem cells) to grow. When the healthy stem cells from a donor are infused into a patient, they may help the patient's bone marrow make more healthy cells and platelets and may help destroy any remaining cancer cells. This study may help doctors determine whether treosulfan-based or clofarabine-based conditioning regimen works better before donor hematopoietic stem cell transplant in treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive treosulfan intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on days -6 to -4 and fludarabine IV over 30 minutes on days -6 to -2. Patients also undergo total-body irradiation (TBI) followed by HCT on day 0. Patients undergo echocardiography (ECHO) or multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) and lumbar puncture pre-transplant and undergo bone marrow aspiration, bone marrow biopsy, and collection of blood samples at pre-transplant and post-transplant. ARM B: Patients receive clofarabine IV over 2 hours on days -6 to -2. Patients also undergo TBI followed by HCT on day 0. Patients undergo ECHO or MUGA and lumbar puncture pre-transplant and undergo bone marrow aspiration, bone marrow biopsy, and collection of blood samples at pre-transplant and post-transplant. After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up at days 28, 56, 84 and 180, years 1 and 1.5 and then annually for 5 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
23
Given IV
Given IV
Undergo HCT
Undergo TBI
Given IV
Undergo ECHO
Undergo MUGA
Undergo lumbar puncture
Undergo bone marrow aspiration
Undergo bone marrow biopsy
Undergo collection of blood samples
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, United States
Relapse-free survival
Time frame: At 6 months after transplant
Overall survival
Time frame: At 1 year after transplant
Rate of non-relapse mortality
Time frame: At 1 year after transplant
Relapse rate
Time frame: At 1 year after transplant
Incidence of acute graft versus host disease
Time frame: At 1 year after transplant
Duration of hospitalization
Time frame: Up to day 100 post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.