The trial will develop and validate a platform for quantitative assessment of antiviral effects in low-risk patients with high viral burdens and uncomplicated COVID-19 to determine in-vivo antiviral activity. In this randomized open label, controlled, group sequential adaptive platform trial, we will assess the performance of three distinct types of intervention relative to control (no treatment): A: Small molecule drugs; B: Monoclonal antibodies; C: Dose finding for the constituent parts of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir PLATCOV study is supported by the Wellcome Trust Grant ref: 223195/Z/21/Z through the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator.
The platform trial will assess drugs with potential SARS-CoV-2 antiviral activity of three general types: A. Small molecule drugs: currently nitazoxanide, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, atilotrelvir/ritonavir and metformin. B. Monoclonal antibodies: Sotrovimab and any other monoclonal antibodies that become available. Monoclonal antibodies are vulnerable to viral escape mutations. Tracking their performance over time is important to characterise the impact and inform the therapeutics of mutant SARS-CoV-2 strains. This will also be important for other antivirals. Monoclonal antibodies are expensive and cannot be produced at large scale currently, but this may change in the near future. These drugs will be included if there is local availability and regulatory approval. C. : Dose finding for the constituent parts of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir has shown clinical efficacy in phase III studies, however, there are disadvantages to using it (drug-drug interactions, side effects, cost). In the urgent context of the pandemic, a higher dose of ritonavir was chosen to guarantee maximum boosting effect. We do not know if the maximal boosting effect could have been achieved with less, or even without ritonavir. It will be investigated whether reducing the doses of the constituent parts can still retain the effectiveness. Randomization to the no antiviral treatment control arm (no intervention) will be fixed at a minimum of 20% throughout the study. The randomization ratios will be uniform for all available interventions. Recruitment into the ivermectin arm was stopped on April 18th 2022 due to meeting the pre- defined stopping criteria. Recruitment into the remdesivir arm was stopped on June 10th 2022 due to meeting the pre- defined stopping criteria. Recruitment into the REGN-COV2 arm was stopped on October 20th 2022 due to meeting the pre-defined stopping criteria. Recruitment into the favipiravir arm was stopped on October 31st 2022 due to meeting the pre-defined stopping criteria. Recruitment into the molnupiravir arm was stopped on February 22nd 2023 due to meeting the pre-defined stopping criteria. Recruitment into the fluoxetine arm was stopped on May 8th 2023 due to meeting the pre-defined stopping criteria. Recruitment into the evusheld arm was stopped on July 4th 2023 due to meeting the pre-defined stopping criteria. Recruitment into the ensitrelvir arm was stopped on April 21st 2024 due to meeting the pre-defined stopping criteria. Recruitment into the combination molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (e.g. PAXLOVID™) arm was stopped on May 31st 2024 due to meeting the pre-defined stopping criteria.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
3,800
Nirmatrelvir 300mg BD for 5/7 Ritonavir 100mg BD for 5/7
Nitazoxanide 1.5g BD 7/7
Molnupiravir 800mg BD for 5/7, Nirmatrelvir 300mg BD for 5/7, Ritonavir 100mg BD for 5/7
Hydroxychloroquine 400mg D0 BD and 400MG OD for a further 6/7
No treatment (except antipyretics- paracetamol)
Monoclonal antibodies: 300mg tixagevimab/ 300 mg cilgavimab given once on D0
Fluoxetine 40mg OD for 7/7
Molnupiravir 800mg BD for 5/7
Sotrovimab 500mg given once on D0
Ensitrelvir 375mg OD D0 and 125mg OD for a further 4/7
Monoclonal antibodies: 600mg casirivimab/ 600mg imdevimab given once on D0
Favipiravir 1800mg BD D0 and 800mg BD for a further 6/7
Ivermectin 600micrograms/kg/day for 7/7.
Remdesivir 200mg D0 and 100mg for a further 4/7.
Atilotrelvir 150mg BD for 5/7 Ritonavir 100mg BD for 5/7
Metformin 500mg TDS 5/7
Nirmatrelvir 300mg BD for 5/7 Ritonavir 50mg BD for 5/7
Nirmatrelvir 150mg BD for 5/7 Ritonavir 50mg BD for 5/7
Nirmatrelvir 300mg BD for 5/7
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Minas Gerais, Brazil
RECRUITINGLaos-Oxford-Mahosot Wellcome Trust Research Unit
Vientiane, Laos
RECRUITINGSukraraj Tropical & Infectious Disease Hospital
Kathmandu, Nepal
RECRUITINGThe Aga Khan University Hospital
Karachi, Pakistan
TERMINATEDVajira hospital
Bangkok, Thailand
TERMINATEDFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University
Bangkok, Thailand
RECRUITINGBangplee Hospital
Mueang Samut Prakan, Thailand
TERMINATEDRate of viral clearance for interventions relative to the no study arm (This is a superiority comparison)
Rate of viral clearance- estimated from the log10 viral density derived from qPCR of standardised duplicate oropharyngeal swabs/ saliva taken daily from baseline (day 0) to day 5 for each intervention compared with the no antiviral treatment control i.e., those not receiving study drug
Time frame: Days 0-5
Rate of viral clearance for interventions relative to the positive control arm (This is a non-inferiority or superiority comparison).
Rate of viral clearance- estimated from the log10 viral density derived from qPCR of standardised duplicate oropharyngeal swabs/ saliva taken daily from baseline (day 0) to day 5 for interventions compared with the current best antiviral treatment option (accelerated viral clearance relative to the positive control arm)
Time frame: Days 0-5
Viral kinetic levels in early COVID-19 disease
Rate of viral clearance estimated from the log10 viral density derived from qPCR of standardised duplicate oropharyngeal swabs/ saliva taken daily from baseline (day 0) to day 5 for each therapeutic arm compared with the no antiviral treatment control i.e., those not receiving study drug
Time frame: Days 0-5
Optimal dosing regimens through pharmacometric assessment for antiviral drugs with evidence of efficacy in the literature or from the trial data (e.g., Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, Ensitrelvir etc).
Rate of viral clearance- estimated from the log10 viral density derived from qPCR of standardised duplicate oropharyngeal swabs/ saliva taken daily from baseline (day 0) to day 5 for each therapeutic arm compared with the no antiviral treatment control i.e., those not receiving study drug
Time frame: Days 0-5
Viral rebound of studied treatment arms in comparison to contemporaneous controls (e.g. no study drug arm, positive control)
After stopping treatment for at least 24 hours (or 5 days if no drug is given or a single dose monoclonal antibody is given), rebound is defined as an oropharyngeal eluate viral density estimate \>1000 genomes per ml for at least 1 timepoint (average 2 swabs), after \>2 consecutive days of average daily viral density estimate less than 100 genomes per ml
Time frame: Days 6-14
Rates of fever clearance and symptom resolution with respect to no treatment
The following endpoints will be used: * Time to resolution of fever * Area Under the Curve of recorded temperature * Time to resolution of symptoms
Time frame: Days 0-14
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.