The primary objective of this study is to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) between sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (SG) and pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) and pembrolizumab in participants with previously untreated, locally advanced inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, whose tumors express programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
443
Administered intravenously
Administered intravenously
Administered intravenously
Administered intravenously
Administered intravenously
Administered intravenously
Alaska Oncology and Hematology
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC-Hope,1845 W Orange Grove Rd
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC-Hope,2070 W. Rudasill Rd.
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC-Hope
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC-Hope,1620 West St. Mary's Road
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective progressive disease (PD) or death (whichever comes first).
Time frame: Randomization up to approximately 33 months
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause.
Time frame: Randomization up to approximately 53 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by BICR per RECIST Version 1.1
ORR is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) that is confirmed at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response.
Time frame: Randomization up to approximately 53 months
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by BICR per RECIST Version 1.1
DOR is defined as the time from the first documentation of CR or PR to the earlier of the first documentation of objective PD or death from any cause (whichever comes first).
Time frame: Randomization up to approximately 53 months
Time to Response (TTR) as Assessed by BICR per RECIST Version 1.1
TTR is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first documentation of CR or PR.
Time frame: Randomization up to approximately 53 months
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: First dose date up to 53 months plus 30 days
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: First dose date up to 53 months plus 30 days
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) Scale as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core Questionnaire, Version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients, it is composed of 30 questions (items) resulting in 5 functional scales, 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales, and 6 single items. Scoring of the QLQ-C30 is performed according to QLQ-C30 Scoring manual. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score for the functioning scales and global health status denote a better level of functioning (i.e. a better state of the participant), while higher scores on the symptom and single-item scales indicate a higher level of symptoms (i.e. a worse state of the participant).
Time frame: Randomization up to approximately 53 months
TTD of Pain Score as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients, it is composed of 30 questions (items) resulting in 5 functional scales, 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales, and 6 single items. Scoring of the QLQ-C30 is performed according to QLQ-C30 Scoring manual. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score for the functioning scales and global health status denote a better level of functioning (i.e. a better state of the participant), while higher scores on the symptom and single-item scales indicate a higher level of symptoms (i.e. a worse state of the participant).
Time frame: Randomization up to approximately 53 months
TTD of Fatigue Score as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients, it is composed of 30 questions (items) resulting in 5 functional scales, 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales, and 6 single items. Scoring of the QLQ-C30 is performed according to QLQ-C30 Scoring manual. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score for the functioning scales and global health status denote a better level of functioning (ie, a better state of the participant), while higher scores on the symptom and single-item scales indicate a higher level of symptoms (ie, a worse state of the participant).
Time frame: Randomization up to approximately 53 months
TTD of Physical Functioning Domain Score as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients, it is composed of 30 questions (items) resulting in 5 functional scales, 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales, and 6 single items. Scoring of the QLQ-C30 is performed according to QLQ-C30 Scoring manual. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score for the functioning scales and global health status denote a better level of functioning (ie, a better state of the participant), while higher scores on the symptom and single-item scales indicate a higher level of symptoms (ie, a worse state of the participant).
Time frame: Randomization up to approximately 53 months
TTD of Role Functioning Score as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients, it is composed of 30 questions (items) resulting in 5 functional scales, 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales, and 6 single items. Scoring of the QLQ-C30 is performed according to QLQ-C30 Scoring manual. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score for the functioning scales and global health status denote a better level of functioning (ie, a better state of the participant), while higher scores on the symptom and single-item scales indicate a higher level of symptoms (ie, a worse state of the participant).
Time frame: Randomization up to approximately 53 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Genesis Cancer and Blood Institute
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
Genesis Cancer and Blood Institute,1456 Higdon Ferry Road Suite B.
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
Saint Bernards Medical Center
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
Saint Bernards Medical Center,4000 Linwood Drive
Paragould, Arkansas, United States
University of California Los Angeles - Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center,201 S. Buena Vista Street, Suite 200
Burbank, California, United States
...and 494 more locations