This phase II/III trial compares the effect of the combination treatment with olaparib and temozolomide to trabectedin or pazopanib (two of the most common chemotherapy drugs used as usual approach) in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma that may have spread from where it first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced) after initial chemotherapy has stopped working. The usual approach is defined as care most people get for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma. Olaparib is a PARP inhibitor. PARP is a protein that helps repair damaged deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Blocking PARP may prevent tumor cells from repairing their damaged DNA, causing them to die. PARP inhibitors are a type of targeted therapy. Temozolomide is in a class of medications called alkylating agents. It works by slowing or stopping the growth of tumor cells in the body. The combination of olaparib and temozolomide may work better than the usual treatment in shrinking or stabilizing advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma after initial chemotherapy has stopped working.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the progression free survival (PFS) of olaparib plus temozolomide (Arm 1) as compared to investigator's choice (trabectedin or pazopanib hydrochloride \[pazopanib\]) (Arm 2) for the treatment of patients with advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) who have received two or more prior lines of therapy as determined by investigator (local site) assessment. (Phase 2) II. To compare the overall survival (OS) of olaparib plus temozolomide (Arm 1) as compared to investigator's choice (trabectedin or pazopanib) (Arm 2) for the treatment of patients with advanced uLMS who have received two or more prior lines of therapy. (Phase 3) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of each treatment by determining adverse events using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5 and patient-reported toxicity using Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-CTCAE version 1 in and across each treatment arm. (Phase 2/3) II. To evaluate the objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR) and disease control rate (DCR) in and across each treatment arm as determined by investigator assessment. (Phase 2/3) EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. To collect results of tumor genomic testing previously conducted as part of clinical care (when available) and (a) to determine the proportion of patients with a genomic alteration in a homologous recombination (HR) pathway gene and (b) to evaluate for any relationship between the presence of such an alteration and clinical benefit from olaparib and temozolomide. (Phase 2/3) OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM 1: Patients receive temozolomide orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-7 of each cycle and olaparib PO twice daily (BID) on days 1-7 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or bone scans throughout the trial. Patients also undergo collection of blood samples throughout the trial. ARM 2: Patients receive trabectedin intravenously (IV) continuously over 24 hours on day 1 of each cycle or pazopanib PO QD on days 1-21 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo CT scan or MRI and/or bone scans throughout the trial. Patients also undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or multi-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) on study and as clinically indicated, as well as collection of blood samples throughout the trial. After completion of study treatment, patients without disease progression are followed every 6 weeks until disease progression. After disease progression, patients are followed every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months thereafter until 5 years post-randomization or death, whichever comes first.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
73
Undergo collection of blood samples
Undergo bone scan
Undergo CT scan
Undergo MRI
Undergo MUGA
Given PO
Given PO
Given PO
Given IV
Undergo TTE
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Alaska Women's Cancer Care
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Mayo Clinic Hospital in Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Duarte, California, United States
Epic Care-Dublin
Dublin, California, United States
Progression free survival (PFS) (Phase II)
Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, where the stratified log-rank test will be used to compare the distributions across the treatment arms. PFS rates at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years will also be reported, along with 95% confidence intervals. Univariable and multivariable Cox models stratified by the stratification factors used in the randomization will be assessed as well.
Time frame: Time between the date of randomization and the earliest of disease progression or death, assessed up to 5 years
Overall survival (OS) (Phase III)
Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, where the stratified log-rank test will be used to compare the distributions across the treatment arms. OS rates at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years will also be reported, along with 95% confidence intervals. Univariable and multivariable Cox models stratified by the stratification factors used in the randomization will be assessed as well.
Time frame: Time between the date of randomization and the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Overall response rate
Will be estimated by dividing the number of evaluable patients that achieve a confirmed response (partial response \[PR\] or better) by the total number of evaluable patients. This estimate will be calculated by arm and will also include a 95% confidence interval using the properties of the binomial distribution, and compared between the arms using a chi-square test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Duration of response (DOR)
This analysis is restricted to those patients that achieved a confirmed response (PR or better). Patients that go off of study treatment prior to progression will have their DOR time censored at that time.
Time frame: Time from first evidence of response until disease progression (or death), assessed up to 5 years
Disease control rate
Will be estimated using the number of patients that achieve complete response, partial response, or stable disease at the 6 week assessment divided by all evaluable patients. This estimate will be calculated by arm and will also include a 95% confidence interval using the properties of the binomial distribution, and compared between the arms using a chi-square test.
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Incidence of adverse events
Adverse events will be recorded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 for each patient. Frequency tables and summary statistics will be used and with the appropriate methods of evaluating categorical and continuous data. In addition, patient reported safety and tolerability will be assessed using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO)-CTCAE for a prespecified group of expected toxicities. PRO-CTCAE assessments will occur prior to registration and on day 1 of every cycle during treatment. Collection of PRO-CTCAE will be discontinued after cycle 11.
Time frame: Up to 4 weeks after the end of study treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Epic Care Partners in Cancer Care
Emeryville, California, United States
City of Hope at Irvine Lennar
Irvine, California, United States
Contra Costa Regional Medical Center
Martinez, California, United States
Epic Care Cyberknife Center
Walnut Creek, California, United States
UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, United States
...and 135 more locations