Lassa fever (LF) is a viral haemorrhagic fever responsible of 5000 deaths per year in West Africa, with in-hospital mortality at 12%. Transmission to humans occurs mainly via direct or indirect exposure to excreta from the rodent reservoir, mainly made up of Mastomys natalensis . Less frequently, LASV may also be transmitted from human to human and cause nosocomial outbreaks. Ribavirin is the only treatment available with worrying toxicity, questionable efficacy and low access because of its high cost. Consequently, there is an urgent need for new drugs to treat LF patients. The Research and Development (R\&D) Blueprint of the World Health Organization (WHO) has included LF in the list of priority diseases for urgent research and development. The INTEGRATE consortium is an unprecedented international collaboration on Lassa fever of 15 partners from 10 countries across West Africa, Europe and North America and across several disciplines (epidemiological researchers, social scientists, medical health facility professionals, humanitarian actors, etc.).
The INTEGRATE study is a platform, multinational, multicentre, sequential, seamless phase II-III, controlled, randomised, superiority trial in open-label parallel arms. Three arms will be assessed and compared to the SCD. Its primary objective is to compare the efficacy of each Investigational Medical Product (IMP) to Standard of Care Drug (SCD) to prevent death or organ failure in hospitalized patients with confirmed LF. Secondary objectives will be i) to compare the safety and tolerability of each IMP and SCD, ii) to compare the efficacy of each IMP and SCD on clinical, virological and biological parameters, iii) to describe the pharmacokinetics of each IMP and iv) to develop a pharmacokinetics / pharmacodynamics model for each IMP informing about optimal dosing regimens and dose-response relationship. 1. Objectives 1.1 Primary objective The primary objective of the trial is to compare the efficacy of each IMP and SCD to prevent death or organ failure in hospitalized participants with confirmed LF. 1.2. Secondary objectives * To compare the safety and tolerability of each IMP and SCD * To compare the efficacy of each IMP and SCD on clinical, virological and biological parameters * To describe the pharmacokinetics of each IMP * To develop a pharmacokinetics / pharmacodynamics model for each IMP informing about optimal dosing regimens and dose-response relationship 2. Design * Phase II: comparative controlled design * Phase III: Whitehead's sequential double triangular design 3. Sample size: In the current version of the protocol (if all sub-protocols start at once): * 3 IMPs go into phase III: N= 732 * 2 IMPs go into phase III: N= 585 * 1 IMP go into phase III: N= 438 4. Duration * Hospitalization: 10 days * Follow-up: 28 days
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
1,755
Interventional Medicinal Product (IMP)
Control arm
Interventional Medicinal Product (IMP)
Investigational Medicinal Product
Investigational Medicinal Product
Phebe Hospital
Suacoco, Bong County, Liberia
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGIrrua Specialist Teaching Hospital
Irrua, Edo, Nigeria
RECRUITINGFederal Medical Center Owo
Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
RECRUITINGAbubakar Tafawa Balewa University Teaching Hospital
Bauchi, Nigeria
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGDeath
Proportion of participants death definition by Y/N measure Clinical aggravation is defined as the first occurrence of one of the following conditions, at any time point between baseline and Day 14 (included): Death, or Increase (+1 or +2) in the number (0, 1 or 2) of organ failures among: Renal failure: KDIGO stage 3 Respiratory failure: SpO2/FiO2\* ≤ 315 Cardiovascular failure: MBP\*\* \< 65 mmHg or SBP \< 90 mmHg (measured twice with a time interval of 10 min) and lactate \> 2 mmol/L Analysis per component Proportion of participants with a newly occurring component of the composite primary endpoint between Day 0 and Day 14. Sensitivity analyses Proportion of participants presenting no clinical aggravation between baseline and Day 14, with varying thresholds on the definitions of organ failures or adding different organ failures definition (e.g. neurologic, hepatic, hematologic, etc.).
Time frame: Day 28
New onset of acute kidney failure
Proportion of participants a new onset of acute kidney failure . Definition by KDIGO 3 measure. 3.0 times baseline, OR increase in serum creatinine to ≥4.0 mg/dl (≥353.6 mmol/l). The composite endpoint assesses the new onset of an event from D0
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
New onset of acute respiratory failure
Proportion of participants a new onset of acute respiratory failure. Definition by SpO2/FiO2 ≤ 315 measure The composite endpoint assesses the new onset of an event from D0
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
New onset of shock
Proportion of participants a New onset of shock. Mean Blood Pressure (MBP) \< 65 mmHg or Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) \< 90 mmHg (measured twice with a time interval of 10 min) and lactate \> 2 mmol/L measured at the same time The composite endpoint assesses the new onset of an event from D0
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Safety of each IMP and SCD
Proportion (events and participants with at least one event) of: * Adverse Event\* grade 3 and higher * Serious Adverse Event * Adverse Event of Special Interest
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Safety of each IMP and SCD
Proportion (events and participants with at least one event) of: Adverse Event\* grade 3 and higher * Serious Adverse Event * Adverse Event of Special Interest
Time frame: Day 0, Day 28
Organ failure from composite primary endpoint
Proportion of participants with a newly occurring component of the composite primary endpoint
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
New onset of Acute Kidney Injury
Proportion of participants meeting KDIGO ≥ 2 or initiation of renal replacement therapy parameters
Time frame: Between Day 0 and discharge
New onset of CVPU or seizure
Proportion of participants with CVPU or seizure
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge
New onset of Bleeding
Proportion of participants meeting WHO bleeding scale grade 2 or above
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge
New onset of Severe anaemia
Proportion of participants with Hb level \< 8 g/dL
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge
New onset of liver failure
Proportion of participants with AST or ALT ≥ 3 ULN
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge
New onset of clinical severity score
Proportion of participants with a NEWS2 score ≥7
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge
Intensive care strategies - oxygen therapy
Proportion of participants having received oxygen therapy
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge
Intensive care strategies - RRT
Proportion of participants having received RRT
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge
Intensive care strategies - blood transfusion
Proportion of participants having received blood transfusion
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge
Intensive care strategies- inotropes or vasopressors
Proportion of participants having received inotropes or vasopressors
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge
the viral clearance - Change in LF RT-PCR Ct
value (for each target gene) from D0
Time frame: Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, Day 9
the viral clearance - Change in LASV viral
titer from D0
Time frame: D01-D10
viral clearance - LASV RT-PCR
\<LLQ
Time frame: D01- D10
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
• Peak concentration (Cmax)
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
• Time to peak concentration (Tmax)
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
• Area under the curve
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
• Half-life
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
• Clearance
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
• Volume(s) of distribution
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
PK/PD (phase II only)
• Prediction of initial viral load and slope of decline
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
PK/PD (phase II only)
• Optimal dosing regimen with PK/PD modelling
Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
LASV RT-PCR
LASV RT-PCR (Ct value)
Time frame: D28 if participants have a positive RT PCR at discharge
Peak CRP (Phase II stage only)
Peak CRP level (mg/L)
Time frame: D01-D10
Time to first LASV RT-PCR <LLOQ
Time to first LASV RT-PCR \<LLOQ (days)
Time frame: D01-D10
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.