Down syndrome (DS) is typically caused by an extra chromosome 21 in the cell nucleus (trisomy 21, or T21). T21 is both the most common cause of genetically defined intellectual disability and the earliest documented cause of Alzheimer's disease (AD)-type pathology. Currently, all presymptomatic individuals with DS are classified as having 'Stage 0' DS-associated AD (DSAD). DSAD pathology evolves inexorably, with virtually all individuals with DS developing AD pathology by age 40, and approximately 50% meeting clinical dementia diagnosis criteria at 55 years of age. This study will test the hypothesis that the FDA-approved AD drug memantine, at higher-than-standard doses, may be effective as a cognitive enhancer in adolescents and young adults with DS. The primary goal of this phase 1b clinical trial will be the assessment of the safety and tolerability of three memantine doses in persons with DS. In addition, we will assess the effect of this drug on cognitive test scores and plasma biomarkers of AD in the study participants. Finally, we will also investigate steady-state plasma levels of memantine and the time course of memantine plasma levels after a single dose in the study participants (pharmacokinetics, or PK). The data generated through this phase 1b study will provide the essential safety, PK, and preliminary efficacy signals required to advance a phase 2 trial evaluating high-dose memantine as a first-in-class therapeutic strategy in DS.
Based on preclinical evidence from mouse models of DS collected by our research team and others, we hypothesized over a decade ago that NMDA receptor dysfunction may play significant pathogenic roles in both the neurodevelopmental and the neurodegenerative components of DS. Four years ago, our research team published in the results of a two-site, randomized phase 2 trial of the AD drug memantine to investigate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of this drug on cognitive and adaptive outcome measures in adolescents and young adults with DS. In this study, we found no evidence of cognitive-enhancing effects of standard doses of memantine treatment in the primary analysis. Memantine was well tolerated, with infrequent mild-to-moderate adverse events observed. Notably, however, measured plasma memantine levels in more than 90% of study participants were lower than those considered therapeutic in patients with AD (0.5 -1 μmol/l), and much lower than the doses used in preclinical behavioral studies in mouse models of DS (1.7 μmol/l). In this same clinical study, an exploratory analysis of data from 23 participants with memantine plasma levels \>0.4 μmol/l (representing the top quartile of quantified memantine plasma levels) revealed significant improvement in scores on two neuropsychological measures in the memantine arm compared to the placebo arm. One of these measures (the California Verbal Learning Test short form second version, or CVLT-II sf) assessed episodic memory, whereas the other (the Recall of Digits Forward from the Differential Ability Scales Second Edition, or DAS-II) measured short-term memory. These findings led us to hypothesize that higher-than-standard doses of memantine should produce significant cognitive improvements in most individuals with DS, with minimal adverse events. The exploratory analysis performed in that study pointed to possibility that higher-than-standard therapeutic memantine doses might not only produce statistically significant efficacy in a larger proportion of individuals with DS but also yield effect sizes significantly higher than those observed in that study. Although there are several examples in the literature where memantine was used at doses as high as 60 mg/day in the treatment of various neurological disorders, the key question is whether the majority of individuals with DS would tolerate such doses. Here we describe an open-label phase 1b clinical trial, in which 25 participants with DS will receive escalating doses of memantine (20 mg/day and 40 mg/day for 9 weeks at each of these dosing stages; a third dose of 60 mg/day may be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), pending safety data to be collected at the 40 mg/day dose level in the first 10 study participants). Safety and tolerability will be the primary outcome measures for this phase of the project. However, this initial study will also provide a unique chance for us to fine tune the neuropsychological test battery to better understand the psychometric properties of each test, including test-retest reliability across multiple, closely spaced retest sessions. Assessments of plasma levels of memantine at each dose level will allow us to confirm the expected linear relationship between oral dose and steady state levels of this drug. Additionally, the assessment of plasma levels of various AD plasma biomarkers should provide preliminary objective information on whether memantine can affect such biomarkers at Stage 0 DSAD. The inclusion of a washout visit will allow us to evaluate the reversibility of any observed drug effect. After the washout phase, a single oral dose (20 mg) will be used to evaluate the absorption, distribution, and excretion of memantine in young individuals with DS (through PK properties, such as time to peak, peak concentration, and half-life), which are expected to approximate first order kinetics.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
25
Escalating doses of Memantine: 20 mg/day; 40 mg/day; and potentially 60 mg/day (pending FDA approval after safety data review at the 40 mg/day dose level in the first 10 study participants).
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Safety and Tolerability (as measured by incidence of adverse events)
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) will be monitored by clinical history, physical examinations, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and clinical laboratory tests during and after exposure to the up to three doses of memantine (20, 40, and potentially 60 mg/day; PO). Investigators will record any AE reported by the participants and caregivers and any clinically significant abnormalities. Memantine is expected to be well tolerated at higher than the typical dose used in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (20 mg/day) by at least 80% of the study participants (more precisely, \< 6 participants will drop out of the study due to AEs related to the study medication). Participation discontinuation can be initiated by either the PI/co-investigators or participant/caregiver. Safety data will be collected at the 40 mg/day dose in the first 10 study participants, and a third dose (60 mg/day) will be added (in consultation with the FDA) for the next 15 participants only if 40 mg/day proves to be safe.
Time frame: 27 weeks for the first 10 participants and 36 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
Efficacy of the Drug Memantine as Assessed by Change in Score on the California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II) Short Form Total Free Recall
This secondary outcome measure is focused on episodic memory. The CVLT-III short form assesses supraspan word learning ability as an index of episodic verbal long-term memory. The hypothesis to be tested is that treatment with memantine will produce significant improvements in this test. The main dependent variable selected, based on prior literature was the total number of target items correct summed across learning trials 1-4. The values for this measure will be recorded as change in score from baseline (i.e., before drug intervention or T1) to after the treatment at each of the two-to-three doses and at washout \[T2, T3, T4, and potentially T5 (if the 60 mg/day receives the go-ahead from the FDA\]. Scale Range: from 0 to 36; higher scores represent better outcomes. Different word lists will be used at each testing session to reduce practice effects.
Time frame: 27 weeks for the first 10 participants and 36 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
Efficacy of the Drug Memantine as Assessed by Change in Score on the Recall of Digits Forward (From the Differential Ability Scales; DAS-II)
This is a measure of rote short-term verbal memory. The hypothesis to be tested is that treatment with memantine will produce significant improvements in this test. Total number of items correct will be used as the dependent variable. The values for this measure will be recorded as change in score from baseline (i.e., before drug intervention or T1) to after the treatment at each of the two-to-three doses and at washout \[T2, T3, T4, and potentially T5 (if the 60 mg/day receives the go-ahead from the FDA\]. The minimum value for this scale is 0 and the maximum value is 38; higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: 27 weeks for the first 10 participants and 36 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
Efficacy of the Drug Memantine as Assessed by Change in Score on the Paired Associates Learning (PAL) From the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
This is a measure of non-verbal memory that requires the participant to learn associations between an abstract visual pattern and its location. Two dependent variables have been selected: Total number of items correct on the first trial of each stage, and total number of stages completed. The values for this measure will be recorded as change in score from baseline (i.e., before drug intervention or T1) to after the treatment at each of the two-to-three doses and at washout \[T2, T3, T4, and potentially T5 (if the 60 mg/day receives the go-ahead from the FDA\]. The minimum value of the PAL Memory Score Scale is 0 and the maximum value is 21; higher scores mean better outcomes.
Time frame: 27 weeks for the first 10 participants and 36 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
Efficacy of the Drug Memantine as Assessed by Change in Score on the Pattern Recognition Memory (PRM; Part of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery -- CANTAB)
This is a measure of non-verbal memory. Total number correct across the two series of items presented will be used as the dependent variable. The values for this measure have been recorded as change in score from baseline (i.e., before drug intervention or T1) to after the treatment at each of the two-to-three doses and at washout \[T2, T3, T4, and potentially T5 (if the 60 mg/day receives the go-ahead from the FDA\]. The PRM total scale will be used in this study, which represents the sum of the PRM correct scores (ranging from 0 to 24) and the PRM delayed scores (ranging from 0 to 24). Therefore, the range of the PRM total scale is from 0 to 48; higher values mean better outcomes.
Time frame: 27 weeks for the first 10 participants and 36 weeks for the next 15 participants if the 60 mg/day-dose proves to be safe.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.